Hostile
The Duke
- Messages
- 119,565
- Reaction score
- 4,544
Stash enjoys that. My face is still red from the last time he educated me.iceberg;2104933 said:stash slapped some sense into me. : )
Stash enjoys that. My face is still red from the last time he educated me.iceberg;2104933 said:stash slapped some sense into me. : )
Hostile;2104941 said:Stash enjoys that. My face is still red from the last time he educated me.
stasheroo;2104862 said:Seems like a unique situation to me.
And I for one hope that the team decides to move on, not so much for the money aspect but for the wasted roster spot that could once again result.
While I'm very happy that the team has re-upped with Terrell Owens as I feel he deserves it, it has brought into clearer focus the team's precarious position at receiver.
It is always a bit of a gamble against Father Time by keeping older players, and the Cowboys are taking a calculated risk that Owens can stay healthy at age 34 and beyond.
That would be fine if they had any sort of a backup or contingency plan, but if they continue to count on Terry Glenn, that's too much of a gamble in my book and one that could come back to haunt a team with Super Bowl aspirations.
Nobody can replace Owens, but the team needs to have better options if he does get injured.
And Terry Glenn isn't one.
SMCowboy;2104954 said:If Terry Glenn is not able to make it threw training camps and the mini camps 100%, then he will no doubt be cut. But, if he is able to, them there is no reason not to keep him, he is the one guy, that we have or can get at this stage that could even come close to replacing TO if he went down.
stasheroo;2104951 said:Dat's me!
Internet Tough Guy!
:flex:
Let that be a lesson to the rest of you!
I think with most teams, when they are in this situation, simply cut the player.Hostile;2104888 said:I din't mean that he'd try and trade Glenn, but rather that he'd try harder to acquire a veteran WR.
You've all been duly warned. Heed.stasheroo;2104951 said:Dat's me!
Internet Tough Guy!
:flex:
Let that be a lesson to the rest of you!
Hostile;2104854 said:Once Terry Glenn does this (if he does) what precedent does it set for all future contracts? Does it set a precedent? How will the NFLPA react?
I can see where every team would want waivers like this.
Does this regularly happen and I'm just unaware of it?
So you're saying if he signs it means one of 2 things.jterrell;2105057 said:Not really unique. Teams will generally just cut a guy.
In this case Glenn just has to decide if he can make more money on the open market after being cut or if he could pass a team's physical to earn any paycheck at all. 500K is a lot better than nothing.
500K plus the chance to make 1.7 Mil is a heck of a lot better than nothing.
I would generally feel bad for the player in these situations but Dallas paid him 5 mil last year for a year long rehab and we are tight against the cap so if he is re-injured we need cap space to sign or trade for a replacement.
stasheroo;2104862 said:Seems like a unique situation to me.
Hostile;2105060 said:So you're saying if he signs it means one of 2 things.
A. It's his last big paycheck, and he's going to grab it now.
B. He's all right.