FWST: Michael Hungry For More Work - Will Get It

fishspill

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,783
Reaction score
3,583
wow. 3 carries

I'm still not too far gone to make excuses, so I'll point out one play was shut down by the D but he snuck in for 3 yards, one play had a bobbled snap, the other he just looked blech. Still not allowed to get a series of carries. It's gotta be playbook or protection deficiencies. Not even our coaches are that intractable.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
23,273
Yeah and he looked pathetic in all three, Yet McFadden is running and got robbed on that TD getting called back.

I wouldn't say he looked pathetic. He looks like he is chasing it a little too hard. He's taking the hand off at 100 mph and not having time to cut or react. You can't do that in a zone blocking scheme. You won't get yards. You have to wait for holes to develop. If he always has been like this, it's likely why Seattle let him go. Patience can be a very tough thing to teach a running back at this stage in their careers. I would, however, love to see that explosion on screen, draws and on the goal line though.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
23,273
And some of us heard the rb coach say they were going to take the reins off

And then some of you bought into hype and thought he would start or even get a majority of the carries. Taking the reins off a guy who had only had 2 carries this season, doesn't amount to much, if you think about it.

Then again, McFadden has looked pretty good. That probably has more to do with Michael's lack of carries than anything else. Oh, and they top notch blitz pickup.
 

Fla Cowpoke

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,025
Reaction score
12,046
Dude your a troll....and for McFadden of all things. I can't wait till this guy gets a real shot and then you could crawl back into your mothers basement

Explain to me why you have such a boner for Michael. He has one positive play since he has been here. Meanwhile McFadden has run hard, moved the pile and is over 5 ypc. Yet you poo poo his efforts. Obvious you have pet cats and you get pissed when Dallas doesn't use them.
 

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,509
Reaction score
26,396
Michael had ran hard. Problem is when he is on the field defense knows he is getting the ball and stacks the line. How about running him out of 3 or 4 wide, delays, draws, misdirections. Give him a chance to produce
 

Fla Cowpoke

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,025
Reaction score
12,046
Michael had ran hard. Problem is when he is on the field defense knows he is getting the ball and stacks the line. How about running him out of 3 or 4 wide, delays, draws, misdirections. Give him a chance to produce

The current guy is producing within the scheme....are we really going to change it all for Michael? Or Michaels as his number one cheerleader calls him.
 

Zekeats

theranchsucks
Messages
13,157
Reaction score
15,711
Explain to me why you have such a boner for Michael. He has one positive play since he has been here. Meanwhile McFadden has run hard, moved the pile and is over 5 ypc. Yet you poo poo his efforts. Obvious you have pet cats and you get pissed when Dallas doesn't use them.

It doesn't take a moron much to figure out that McFadden has ran through truck sized holes for all of his damage and C-Mike has gotten carries on all different drives and nothing has been blocked for him. Sorry but some are a little slower than what I mentioned. Also what has Mc done up to this point? I just want a real RB, not a bum.
 

Dave_in-NC

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,049
Reaction score
5,132
It doesn't take a moron much to figure out that McFadden has ran through truck sized holes for all of his damage and C-Mike has gotten carries on all different drives and nothing has been blocked for him. Sorry but some are a little slower than what I mentioned. Also what has Mc done up to this point? I just want a real RB, not a bum.

Have to credit Cassel just a bit to. he's shown he will and can throw down field. That has opened up some running game.
 

fishspill

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,783
Reaction score
3,583
Really I'd just like to get DMac a blow for a few carries. He's going to be worn out by the mid-4th.
 

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,509
Reaction score
26,396
The current guy is producing within the scheme....are we really going to change it all for Michael? Or Michaels as his number one cheerleader calls him.

McFadden really produced well but all our running backs did decent. Even running with Lucky went for great gains. I would let McFadden be the work horse and bring Michael in for 10 or so carries to keep McFadden fresh.
 
Top