That’s not what churning means.So what…the WR Corp was trash last year and needed a complete overhaul…churn baby churn.
That’s what I was going to say. wild speculation. I can’t see him getting traded after his restructuring of his contract.The entire article is wild speculation
This would be a stupid move for Dallas at this time. If they trade Gallup they get a CAP save this year but eat $13 million in dead money next year. I don't know why they would do that.
Indeed.Pure click-bait is more accurate…
So the headline says Dallas is "expected" to trade him. Inside, it says, "potential trade candidate." And then we get the source, a Bleacher Report article speculating that they could trade him. Then it ends by saying, "it’s probably safe to assume it is an idea that may never come to fruition."
Or maybe he is aware of the 2 receivers ahead of him, and focusing on his own job. Seems simple to me.He doomed himself with that interview where he was happy being the third receiver and didn't want anything else.
You don't go into your annual review and tell your boss you are content where you are at.
What in the world are u talking about weirdo?You’re trying to make an argument why fans for other teams pose as fans of Americas Team?
I disagree. You serve only the purpose of being mocked about that sad fact.
Exactly. He has more value keeping him. If he has a bounce back year and Tolbert proves he is a good receiver, then next off season you can look to trade him when he has value and you know more about Tolbert.LOL. Just no.
What would they even get for him? Talk about "selling low". After last season, he would fetch almost nothing. I think he's going to have a big bounce back season this year. He might have some value then. Trade Gallup, and this nice depth at WR doesn't look so deep anymore.
Gregory??? Then cut Williams????? Surely you jest. SURELY.........Gallup for Gregory. Then cut Sam Williams.