Garrett: we don’t use those numbers during a game

[408Cowboy]

How dense are you. It didn't help the Patriots, dolt

The guy that preaches execution doesn't believe practicing in the poor conditions had any effect on the winning team executing better.

The ****ery needs to stop.

 

[HungryLion]

Didn't he win Coach of the Year in 2016?

The same year that he choked away the #1 seed? Yeah that’s the one.

 

[atlantacowboy]

JJ has a whole analytics department he pays. I wonder if this is news to him?

More fuel to the fire

 

[atlantacowboy]

Didn't he win Coach of the Year in 2016?

That is a regular season award. Meaningless.

 

[atlantacowboy]

Anyway I am done arguing with the Garret apologist.

just let me know when Garret wins something Dre. In the meantime I don’t give a damn about hearing excuses about why he hasn’t succeeded yet.

You won't have too much longer. Jerry is finally seeing the light.

 

[vlad]

On 105.3 the fan. Jason Garret was asked about the odds of winning a game, based on analytics, between kicking the last FG or going for it on 4th.

Garret said “we don’t use those numbers during the game”.


I am not the type of person that believes analytics are everything and they are the end all be all. I don’t think you always go with the analytics numbers, because opponent and flow of the game are just as important.

That being said, they don’t use them at all during the game? They don’t at least factor those things in when making the decisions?


That is asinine.

Princeton!

 

[atlantacowboy]

Please tell me that you made that up.
If true I retract my bad mentions on rob Gronkowski

Gronk nailed it actually in a dickish kind of way.

 

[mardwin]

One is a super bowl winning coach... The other one is a defacto coach. Guess which one looks for any advantage to win?

 

[408Cowboy]

Gronk nailed it actually in a dickish kind of way.

I got a laugh out of it

 

[atlantacowboy]

'Of what use are facts and statistics during the game? '

-Jason Garret.

 

[buybuydandavis]

Moore's been here for years under Garrett. He's contaminated.

Got Garrett stank all over him. May never wash off.

 

[buybuydandavis]

'Of what use are facts and statistics during the game? '

-Jason Garret.

I don't know how he's not laughed out of the league.

 

[atlantacowboy]

I don't know how he's not laughed out of the league.

He's a punchline. I was shocked about the Giant rumors. God I hope that happens.

 

[BHendri5]

Is that you @zrinkill??

Yep

 

[willia451]

That is a regular season award. Meaningless.

I guess my snark doesn't translate very well in the written word on a BB. My bad.

 

[Cebrin]

I think this whole, "should have gone for the TD," thing is a perfect example of lemmings jumping on a narrative.

It was 4th and 7. The WRs and QB had multiple issues with handling the ball. There was nearly 7 minutes left in the game and but for good field position from turnovers and a blocked punt NE hadn't done much offensively all game. They in fact got points and the ball back with an opportunity for the lead. That situation was played fine.

Probably would have thrown a touchdown, and had it called back for tripping anyway.

 

[rnr_honeybadger]

Yeah, that's stupid. If you want a coaching decision to get upset about, that is the one!

How about kicking a 50 yard FG into the wind? That set up NE’s first score.

 

[aikemirv]

How about kicking a 50 yard FG into the wind? That set up NE’s first score.

46 - how many did NE try from about that distance? I think 2 against the wind after we missed ours.

 

[Nirvana]

 

[cowboyblue22]

garrett is trying to coach like its the 1990s in a modern league he is a clown I can hardly wait until he is gone there are fans that say it coul d be worse and it could be but it could also be much better u have roster that should be 10 and 1 or 9 and 2 and coaching has cost them three games at least