VACowboy said:
I don't understand the point here. Washington and NY have existed longer and so obviously played and won/lost more games. The important statistic is, who's won more when given the opportunity to play?
Washington: 52.4%
New York: 53.8%
Dallas: 57.4%
How do you figger the Gints and Skins have dominated the division while Dallas has had a good year or two when the Cowboys have won a much higher percentage of their games?
The lower winning percentages are mainly due to recent years.
He said this division has always been about the Cowboys and Commanders. It hasn't. I'm not so sure what's so hard to grasp. The Cowboys haven't even been in this division as long as the Giants and Skins, so how has it always been about them and the Skins?
Kilyin
I said Superbowls, clearly, you know there's a difference.
I didn't see Cooter specify Superbowls.
DC C
And Dallas came into the league and the division when?
Exactly.
Marion
If your looking for stats I have none, I've watched both teams and I think the Giants are the better team.
Skins beat up on the niners and pulled wins out of their ***** against us and the hawks. And squaked by the Bears by 2.
And the Giants, while playing a cup cake schedule have shown me more than the Skins have, they killed several teams and hung with us @ Dallas, which is impressive.
You obviously haven't watched the Skins. The Skins didn't gain the #2 offense and #4 defense by doing nothing. We've gained that by playing extremely soild football. The two best games we've played (besides the 49ers) were against Denver and KC. Two extremely tough teams to beat on the road.
I'd really like to know the logic behind the Giants showing more with a cup cake schedule. The Giants have beat no one with a legit defense. They got punished by SD.
With that schedule that college teams would put up a good fight against, they've only managed to have the #15 offense and #31 defense.
Please inform me on what they've shown. Please.