LittleBoyBlue
Redvolution
- Messages
- 35,766
- Reaction score
- 8,411
parchy said:Joe Gibbs is not just a quack. He is the biggest of all quacks. The 'quackmaster,' if you will.
Bigger than Affleck?
parchy said:Joe Gibbs is not just a quack. He is the biggest of all quacks. The 'quackmaster,' if you will.
skinsngibbs4life said:uh, since when has he done it every week? he only did it for like 3/16 games last year.
And no, I dont think other teams do this
***EDIT***Gfunk, does he really do it EVERY week?
Boyzmamacita said:Do all the teams send footage to the league office every week or this guy some kind of quack?
Waffle said:"Tape"?? How 80s. Does the NFL even have a tape player anymore?
Mr Gibbs, why don't you just make drawings of what happened on some scroll, put it in a bottle, and then throw it in the Atlantic.
Boyzmamacita said:Do all the teams send footage to the league office every week or this guy some kind of quack?
superpunk said::laugh2:
Are carrier pidgeons too "new-age"?
Gfunk said:he sends tapes every week, I'm surprised it took you this long to post about it
skinsngibbs4life said:And no, I dont think other teams do this
***EDIT***Gfunk, does he really do it EVERY week?
skinsngibbs4life said:must be a pretty good quack to be in HoF
Chief said:Come on guys ... he just wants to make the league better.
He's trying to help here, and all he gets is grief for it.
Here he is in his oversized glasses typing up another report for the league office:
:geek:
overfiend60 said:I just don't understand the point. What are they going to do, agree with Gibbs and have some kind of redo over the bye? As far as I'm aware, they've only gone so far as to publically acknowledge mistakes from those Gibbs tapes, like, twice, and as far as I'm aware nothing came of it. I haven't heard about any reprimands on the refs, and as someone else mentioned it probably just results in some added ref bias against them in the long run.
Ultimately it just looks like a temper tantrum from some squeaky voiced, disrespectful, crybaby of a coach. I don't care about HOF status, it's just hard to respect that.
31smackdown said:Can anyone review the tape or tell me if I was the only one who thought that .. during the Jamie Foxx stupid interview... when I think it was L. Betts that fumbled near the sideline.. and then there was an unsportmanlike conduct penalty...
Didn't the ball stay in bounds and get recovered by the Vikings?... it was ruled out of bounds.. but the replay seemed to show that it was a fumble and recovery.. did anyone TIvo and rewatch it?? Just curious
AmishCowboy said:It P.O.'s them because it's the one thing Danny Boy can't buy, the Ref's.