Girl, 6, allegedly videotaped mom having group sex

[TwoCentPlain]

Seriously?? You gotta link?

Sorry, Link Police. No, I don't have a link. And, no, I am not going to look for one for you. If you are that interested, start with Google and see if you can find something. I read it in a newspaper or heard it on the news.

But, don't look for it tonight because there is a Cowboy game on.

 

[tupperware]

Sorry, Link Police. No, I don't have a link. And, no, I am not going to look for one for you. If you are that interested, start with Google and see if you can find something. I read it in a newspaper or heard it on the news.

But, don't look for it tonight because there is a Cowboy game on.

Well can you blame him? That's pretty crazy sounding.

 

[Dawgs0916]

Sorry, Link Police. No, I don't have a link. And, no, I am not going to look for one for you. If you are that interested, start with Google and see if you can find something. I read it in a newspaper or heard it on the news.

But, don't look for it tonight because there is a Cowboy game on.

Kind of an unnecessarily smart ellic response. Sounded like he was genuinely curious about it, but whatever.

 

[peplaw06]

Sorry, Link Police. No, I don't have a link. And, no, I am not going to look for one for you. If you are that interested, start with Google and see if you can find something. I read it in a newspaper or heard it on the news.

But, don't look for it tonight because there is a Cowboy game on.

Fine... I call bull**** then.

I heard a rumor that they're teaching safe sex to toddlers. Don't believe me? I don't care.

 

[vta]

Fine... I call bull**** then.

I heard a rumor that they're teaching safe sex to toddlers. Don't believe me? I don't care.

Hyperbole amidst criticism of the proposal may have caused the idea that condoms would be a part of it, but the claim of introducing sex-ed to kindergarteners isn't bogus...

Link

 

[Hostile]

Some people should never be allowed to become parents.

She isn't a parent, she just gave birth.

 

[Cythim]

Hyperbole amidst criticism of the proposal may have caused the idea that condoms would be a part of it, but the claim of introducing sex-ed to kindergarteners isn't bogus...

Link

That is just hyperbole added to hyperbole. "Keyes based his assertion on his extremist interpretation of sex ed legislation Obama supported in the state Senate." No one was proposing sex-ed for kindergarteners.

 

[Illini88228]

That is just hyperbole added to hyperbole. "Keyes based his assertion on his extremist interpretation of sex ed legislation Obama supported in the state Senate." No one was proposing sex-ed for kindergarteners.

I was part of a pilot program for a similar protocol. They teach very young children that it's okay to talk to the school counselor if someone touches them in a way that makes them uncomfortable. There's no condoms on bananas for kindergarteners.

 

[Cythim]

I was part of a pilot program for a similar protocol. They teach very young children that it's okay to talk to the school counselor if someone touches them in a way that makes them uncomfortable. There's no condoms on bananas for kindergarteners.

This is probably the best info I've heard on the matter. Teaching personal safety isn't the same as teaching the birds and the bees. That is to say, this is common sense stuff, not sex-ed.

 

[big dog cowboy]

There's no condoms on bananas for kindergarteners.

Good. Now I can talk my wife in from the ledge. The thought of our kindergartner son participating in that made her

 

[yimyammer]

[youtube]31pQOiclaTo[/youtube]

 

[CanadianCowboysFan]

I predict CCF will be on here saying how that is not so bad.

I own you so badly

 

[vta]

That is just hyperbole added to hyperbole. "Keyes based his assertion on his extremist interpretation of sex ed legislation Obama supported in the state Senate." No one was proposing sex-ed for kindergarteners.

Not really. It's a broader topic of discussion for a reason, based on the proposal and all the word-play surrounding it doesn't change it from what it is: Sex-Ed for kindergarteners.

It's not explicit or condoms on banana's, but it's introducing the subject to kindergarteners. Why else would it have an 'opt-out' provision?

Link

 

[DallasEast]

http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/General%20Gifs/a8a6b20c.gif​

 

[vta]

http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/General%20Gifs/a8a6b20c.gif​

:laugh2:

Sorry.

 

[bbgun]

more weirdness involving kids

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ritains-youngest-DRAG-QUEEN-Naughty-Nora.html

 

[YosemiteSam]

more weirdness involving kids

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ritains-youngest-DRAG-QUEEN-Naughty-Nora.html

How do you come across articles like that?

...nevermind. I don't wanna know!

 

[Cythim]

Not really. It's a broader topic of discussion for a reason, based on the proposal and all the word-play surrounding it doesn't change it from what it is: Sex-Ed for kindergarteners.

It's not explicit or condoms on banana's, but it's introducing the subject to kindergarteners. Why else would it have an 'opt-out' provision?

Link

The opt-out provision is to satisfy those extremist parents who believe this is a form of Sex-Ed. Teaching a child to report abuse isn't the same as teaching a child the who/what/when/where/why of sex. It it teaching children how to cross a street, not drive a car.

 

[vta]

The opt-out provision is to satisfy those extremist parents who believe this is a form of Sex-Ed. Teaching a child to report abuse isn't the same as teaching a child the who/what/when/where/why of sex. It it teaching children how to cross a street, not drive a car.

Shhhhh. DE is watching.

 

[Cythim]

Shhhhh. DE is watching.

I didn't realize discussing child rearing was against forum policy.