Of course you did, except on draft day you were plugging OL after the first until the Cowboys picked a TE, WR and S then you loved the picks. Then you posted there was still a lot of OL value as the draft progressed until, of course, the Boys didn't pick OL then you jumped on board the bandwagon.
After the first you would have been happy with "Warford and a RB" until the Boys went TE, WR and S and, of course, you jumped on the wagon again.
See a pattern?
You plugged Moore and Schwenke during the draft and now it's "hindsight" and "pitiful" when someone else would have done it because, well, the Boys didn't pick him.
It's OK to be a homer but do you realize that most of your posts are these silly "your post sucks" comebacks and insults in response to any question someone may have about our draft?
While this is the net and no one really gives a hoot, there's a thing called intellectual integrity. Some people don't change their tune after the draft when all they've been talking all off-season has been line help and beefing up the trenches. On the other hand, all you've done is change your position to match the player and position the team drafted.
As was already posted, we took more punters and QB's than we did lineman, even when one was supposedly rated 7th on our draft board but somehow, come draft day and after millions spent scouting, he didn't seem to fit our scheme at #18, value be damned.
We paid 50 million for one corner and gave up a second last year to move up and draft another. Then we bring in 8 more defensive backs between the draft and UFA's. These should raise some valid questions when we've got legitimate concerns on both sides of the line.
You can now go back to insulting without the backbone to produce any type of articulate response. If I didn't know any better, I'd think you work for the Cowboys or at least bucking for a job wearing a skirt and waving pom poms on the sideline during gameday.
