Aerolithe_Lion
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,869
- Reaction score
- 11,841
Thong song got a 69?
And I thought Tebow was all Urban had in his troll game
And I thought Tebow was all Urban had in his troll game
Only the Jags.....
Urban Meyer didnt build that draft boardMeyer has a couple National championships who’s programs had developed numerous nfl top talent for years.. I think he may know a thing a two about talent and development compared to most head coaches ♂️ Y’all laughing at his draft board?? Oh ok
A. That's cute but Jerry has never claimed to be a coach.A. Yes he is. Ask him.
B. There is no end. Fans have family to suffer through.
C. Next........
A. That's cute but Jerry has never claimed to be a coach.
B. Nothing is forever and Jerry is not the rest of his family. After Jerry, we have a chance to get a real GM.
I kind of like this new Tim Tebow obsession. It's a refreshing experience after the Dak obsession of the last 2 years.Did they show the part of the board where they have written in permanent marker: "Tebow, Tim: 11.0"...?
With that rebuttal, you lose the debate.A.
B.
That reminds me, in our last preseason game we will be home against the Jags. Maybe we will get a chance to see Tebow play.I kind of like this new Tim Tebow obsession. It's a refreshing experience after the Dak obsession of the last 2 years.
I'm glad we're working Tebow into every conversation and leaving Dak out of some.
Yeah, most likely the last game Tebow plays. I seriously doubt he makes the team.That reminds me, in our last preseason game we will be home against the Jags. Maybe we will get a chance to see Tebow play.
Notice there isn't a whole lot of difference with a lot of players. People often complain about draft boards and player grades but how much difference is a grade of 7.0, 6.9, 6.8, and 6.4? So, they basically had Etienne, Paye, Campbell, Wilson, and Little with essentially the same grade. I can see why teams take these boards with a grain of salt and sometimes go with hunches.
There just isn't much science when putting together draft board grades. Hence, the hit/miss percentages.
Only the Jags.....
But it.seems to me a teams need at positions would alter his pick value with a particular team. Like with us..Lawrence might be #1 but we will not be interested having Dak already signed. So we look at other players as valuable instead.I don't know that "hunches" is the right term, or that the hit-miss percentages are connected to a lack of "science" in putting together boards.
The range of possible outcomes for any draftee is incredibly high. Even if you had perfect information about the player, there would still be huge error bars around your projection. So yeah, there's no meaningful difference between 6.8 and 7.0, and you can justify picking any of those guys over any other. But you don't need to resort to hunches at that point: there's a lot of variation in the profiles of players with the same score. You may choose one because you think the other might be there at your next pick. One may have a higher ceiling but a lower floor, and so you can choose the risk-reward profile you prefer. When players are rated about the same, that's when you may factor "need" in. There are lots of criteria that should go into the decision-making before you get to "hunch."
Of course, I expect there are plenty of guys who are picked on a hunch anyway.
Except the two time it happened to usOnly the Jags.....
I'd be willing to bet they don't have any of our players under a 7.
FWIW I had trading Dak for Lawrence at an 8000Yes but not 7000 and 6400.
Wish we’d have taken Tufele. Love that dude’s motor.I don't know that "hunches" is the right term, or that the hit-miss percentages are connected to a lack of "science" in putting together boards.
The range of possible outcomes for any draftee is incredibly high. Even if you had perfect information about the player, there would still be huge error bars around your projection. So yeah, there's no meaningful difference between 6.8 and 7.0, and you can justify picking any of those guys over any other. But you don't need to resort to hunches at that point: there's a lot of variation in the profiles of players with the same score. You may choose one because you think the other might be there at your next pick. One may have a higher ceiling but a lower floor, and so you can choose the risk-reward profile you prefer. When players are rated about the same, that's when you may factor "need" in. There are lots of criteria that should go into the decision-making before you get to "hunch."
Of course, I expect there are plenty of guys who are picked on a hunch anyway.
Sunshine needs a haircut.To be fair, we're not exactly sure if the scale goes to 9 or not.
The official NFL.com score goes from 5.0 to 8.0, with 8.0 being the perfect prospect, and 5.0 being a training camp body.
If the Jag's scale is similar, they have Lawrence listed as a perfect prospect.