I preface this by saying that I would pick Wentz over Goff because of upside and because Romo has a couple of good years left. But in reviewing film, Goff is the more proven commodity. Right now, Wentz is a one-read QB who has not proven he can go through progressions and hit the right man. Watch his film; you rarely, if at all, see his head move from one side to the other before he throws. NFL draft history is littered with QBs who have great physical attributes, but who proved they could not read a defense... Jeff George, Akili Smith, David Carr, RGIII, etc. I'm not saying Wentz can't do it. Im just saying he hasn't yet... On the other hand, Goff can and has. It's his greatest strength. You watch his film and you see his head move 1, 2, 3 times before he lets the ball go. Even when it is clear he is throwing to an outside receiver in a one-read play, he looks off the safety first. These are traits that a QB needs to succeed in the NFL (along with accuracy and a quick release, which Goff also has). Now, Goff does not have Wentz's arm or mobility. Not even close. But I am coming around to the fact that Goff is the safer pick and I'd be happy to have him at 4 (if Ramsey is not there). If Romo went down this year, I am confident Goff could win more games than Wentz. And while he may not have Wentz's upside (Andrew Luck), he has enough upside (Matt Ryan) and less downside. Just my opinion.
