Let me help you out since you've proven you can't type anything without being completely intellectually dishonest. These posts are put in sequential order. Do you know what sequential means? It means they are placed in order by number in this case to provide context from the very start, which is something you didn't do (go figure).
POST #250
This is post #250 from xwalker with the bunk claim that "55 is "almost 150% more" than 37. You'll then notice you two goofs "liking" the post in
sincere ignorance because you don't have the collective brain power to see that claim on its face is bunk. It's also equal parts hilarious and laughable that you don't understand when you see the word "more" in this context, it means the percentage increase from a given number. I know I'm talking over your head, but try to follow along.
POST #255
Here's my initial post (#255) correcting him that "55 to 37 rushing TDs is not almost 150% more [...]" So your cute little attempt to try and save face by taking my posts out of context is completely undermined by the actual facts
POST #259
This is you heeeehawing (post #259) in delightful ignorance because you didn't (and still don't comprehend) understand the original claim that 55 is "150% more" than 37 is obviously wrong ON ITS FACE, luuulz. LET ME SPELL THAT OUT FOR YOU: xwalker didn't claim "55 is 150% of 37" He claimed 55 is "almost 150%
more" than 37.
POST #260
Here's my subsequent post (#260) correcting xwalker (who also doesn't understand basic math) and walking him through what he's actually trying to show. Notice, "percentage increase" which is consistent with my entire point carried through the thread.
