Maybe some do, but I still think there are plenty who remember him as being worse than he ever was (which is the main reason I responded to the perceived criticism of him). Some will only look at playoff victories, which are used to judge quarterbacks but no other player.
While I was trying to find the photo/article about him practicing with his teammates on their own, I ran across this one from when he retired that lays out how good he actually was:
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...in-big-moments-during-his-career-think-again/
It's a shame that we didn't put it together around him to get him a title. Some will always believe he wasn't good enough because of that, but if the Ravens can do it with Dilfer, if the Bucs can do it with Brad Johnson, Raiders with Jim Plunkett, Giants with Jeff Hostetler and even the Eagles with Nick Foles, there really can be no doubt that we could win a title with Romo or with Dak. The team simply hasn't been good enough, and the quarterbacks get the blame for it.
Let me add that that doesn't mean the QB is above criticism, but usually in a loss there are multiple reasons for it. The QB may be a small part, but change one of the other factors and maybe the QB's small part wouldn't have mattered. After all, QBs make mistakes in victories too. They miss passes they shouldn't have missed. They throw interceptions. But if the defense holds up or the running game dominates, then those mistakes might not matter and what's remembered are the plays they made instead of the mistakes they made.