Gosselin on 103.3

Vintage

The Cult of Jib
Messages
16,714
Reaction score
4,888
theogt;1589925 said:
The comment was that they were the "most complete" team. I took issue with that statement.

Looks like, by your own admission, they're not "complete" at wide receiver.


The complete comment was made by someone else.

You said they have zero at WR.

I said they had more than zero.

Even if they lack a true #1 WR, they have a good #2, and a solid #3 that has potential to be good.

AKA more than zero.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Vintage;1589932 said:
The complete comment was made by someone else.

You said they have zero at WR.

I said they had more than zero.

Even if they lack a true #1 WR, they have a good #2, and a solid #3 that has potential to be good.

AKA more than zero.
Of course they have more than zero. Every teams has to have some receivers on their roster. Don't read every word literally. Take them in context, please.
 

Vintage

The Cult of Jib
Messages
16,714
Reaction score
4,888
theogt;1589936 said:
Of course they have more than zero. Every teams has to have some receivers on their roster. Don't read every word literally. Take them in context, please.

I wasn't taken it literally, thanks.

They have a solid WR core.

If you think QB is a problem on their team; fine. Their OL stuggled a bit last year too; fine. I wasn't disagreeing with those.

I just disagreed that receiver was an area of concern for them which is what your original post was implying. That's what I was addressing in my post. I didn't think you actually meant "zero" in terms of talent.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Vintage;1589940 said:
I wasn't taken it literally, thanks.

They have a solid WR core.

If you think QB is a problem on their team; fine. Their OL stuggled a bit last year too; fine. I wasn't disagreeing with those.

I just disagreed that receiver was an area of concern for them which is what your original post was implying. That's what I was addressing in my post. I didn't think you actually meant "zero" in terms of talent.
If by solid you mean below average, yeah, you're right.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
theogt;1589869 said:
No kidding. They have zero receivers worth a damn and a washed up QB. Their running game will be pretty good, but it won't be enough to keep the offense afloat.

Expect another 15-6 loss in the playoffs.

Mark Clayton is worth a damn
 

jbsg02

Active Member
Messages
1,719
Reaction score
0
a top 5 defense this year matched with our offensive talent (if healthy) will put us deep into the playoffs
 
Top