Gotta Say, I don't love the new 42 look on Defense

[ABQCOWBOY]

Go to golden pride, get a #9 and you’ll feel better

I won't. Besides, I like their Chicken better then I do their Breakfast Burritos, although, you ar right that a number 9 is pretty good in a pinch. I like my Wife's breakfast burritos best, LOL.......

 

[xwalker]

What is confusing here? I don't like how we looked in the 42 and I don't like the 42 to begin with. Just because most teams are using the 42 more and more for coverage doesn't mean we are good at it or that it's the best way for us to go. Good teams dictate, they don't follow along. I'm surprised you even asked the question you do here Walker.

They ran it way less than Marinelli did vs the Rams.

There are limited options on passing downs vs 3 WR sets. It's either 4-2-5 or 3-3-5.

 

[xwalker]

Not to mention losing your starting 1T before the season even started.

McCoy is a 3tech in a 4 man DL.

 

[Cebrin]

McCoy is a 3tech in a 4 man DL.

Someone pointed that earlier. Can't correct it now. Point still stands, however. Lost of cog in the wheel before we even got started.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

They ran it way less than Marinelli did vs the Rams.

There are limited options on passing downs vs 3 WR sets. It's either 4-2-5 or 3-3-5.

You run what your personnel fit best. Our LBs don't fit well in that scheme. I mean, I don't know how else to say it. Sorry you don't like that X but it's still the truth.

 

[Kumala808]

May be looking at 0-3 to start if they dont find a way to a win today