Dodger12
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,142
- Reaction score
- 3,532
Hostile;2172921 said:I find it to be an absolute joke and travesty. The voters don't know football if they vote no on his inclusion.
To see how huge his impact was simply look at when the Cowboys began to move from expansion team to powerhouse and what the biggest factor was.
It is obvious.
Last night I watched the "Top 10 Players Not in the HOF" segment on the NFL Network which was discussed here a couple of days ago. What I found ironic is that almost all the sports writers/voters who were interviewed, many from other cities, almost were unanimous that Bob Hayes should be #1 on that list. That got me thinking, what are these guys talking about in the HOF comittee meetings? How can one side feel that he belongs so strongly and the other side be so oposed?
The lone disenter interviewed was that tool Howard Eskin from Philly. The best he could say about Bob Hayes was that he was fast but not a very good receiver (paraphrasing). His Philly despise for Dallas was so apparent in that he couldn't even find anything positive to say about Hayes except that he was fast. How can two sides be on so opposite ends of the spectrum? What an injustice for such a revolutionary talent.