Big D
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,222
- Reaction score
- 3,878
If it was 16-31 do you think anyone would mention it?As predicted....this stupid stat is trotted out to mask Dak’s craptastic play.
If it was 16-31 do you think anyone would mention it?As predicted....this stupid stat is trotted out to mask Dak’s craptastic play.
If it was 16-31 do you think anyone would mention it?
As in, "TAG, you're IT!!"Shh "Dak has the" it factor![]()
is you feel with him under center you can win important games that actually matter.
Haven’t felt that way since Aikman.
Wins is a stupid stat? That’s all that matters.
A lot of those wins appear to have happened in spite of the overall offensive ineptitude, not because it was Dak in particular at the helm.
is you feel with him under center you can win important games that actually matter.
Haven’t felt that way since Aikman.
Wins is a stupid stat? That’s all that matters.
is you feel with him under center you can win important games that actually matter.
Haven’t felt that way since Aikman.
True, the nfl is the ultimate team game but you know as well as I do that he would have to shoulder the blame for the losses. lol he has to shoulder the blame fro dropped passes wether it's his fault or not. And before I get the dakazoid label I know he's not the best qb, it's just comical to see such extremes when it comes to him. I guess it comes with the star on the helmet. Either way, go cowboys!It would be equally as stupid.
Wins or losses attributed to one player is comically misguided.
A lot of those wins occurred because of Dak’s Clutch play.