Greg Jennings: "Daniel Jones is a top-10 quarterback, he's better than Dak Prescott."

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,532
Reaction score
76,369
Of course he’s not worth that contract. Dak’s not worth his either lol.

I’d take neither one of them over a solid QB on a rookie deal.
I would as well. I’d literally take any good qb on a rookie deal over a good qb with a max contract.. That’s a no brainer…with Mahomes being the exception. That doesn’t mean Daniel Jones is better though lol.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,588
Reaction score
86,031
Then why did they win 4 games prior to him getting here?
Please don’t tell me you don’t think Dak walked into a optimal situation as a rookie..

It would be very dumb to try and point to the previous seasons record and ignore the best Oline in the league, top 2 RB, and Dez/Beasley/Witten combo.
 

Smith22

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,689
Reaction score
1,327
Context.


Dak has been in a optimal situation nearly his entire career.

Everyone knows that besides a few Cowboys fans who think a tackle missing a game or a WR1 getting traded is the equivalent of what Daniel Jones has had to deal with lol.
CONTEXT:

top 10 draft pick






4th round draft pick.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,532
Reaction score
76,369
I honestly think if Dak was on the Giants last year he doesn't get them anywhere close to the playoffs. Jones put down a ton of rushing yards last year saving and winning many games.

Didn't the Giants OL rank as one of the worst again? Dak would be a pinball machine behind the giants OL cause he's not running like Jones

Doesn't mean Jones is better though
Dak hasn’t had a good offensive line in years. You guys hold that against him but having a good line or bad line…if you can’t play qb it doesn’t matter. Daniel Jones doesn’t get that excuse. Borrow has had a good line and got to the SB.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,338
Reaction score
11,290
Please don’t tell me you don’t think Dak walked into a optimal situation as a rookie..

It would be very dumb to try and point to the previous seasons record and ignore the best Oline in the league, top 2 RB, and Dez/Beasley/Witten combo.
your kinda shooting at your own argument...so remove Zeke and Romo and the team won 4 games? does that point to a stacked team?
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,532
Reaction score
76,369
Please don’t tell me you don’t think Dak walked into a optimal situation as a rookie..

It would be very dumb to try and point to the previous seasons record and ignore the best Oline in the league, top 2 RB, and Dez/Beasley/Witten combo.
I’m asking you a question…why did they win 4 games with the best offensive line in the league, the Dez/Witten/Beasley combo and top running game?
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,588
Reaction score
86,031
I’m asking you a question…why did they win 4 games with the best offensive line in the league, the Dez/Witten/Beasley combo and top running game?
Because their backup QB was beyond awful and they didn’t have Zeke.

I know what you’re trying to do but it’s not as clever or as smart as you think it is.

Everyone knows Dak walked into a great situation. Like everybody but you I guess.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,588
Reaction score
86,031
your kinda shooting at your own argument...so remove Zeke and Romo and the team won 4 games? does that point to a stacked team?
Are you really arguing that Dak didn’t play in an optimal situation? Really?
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,338
Reaction score
11,290
Because their backup QB was beyond awful and they didn’t have Zeke.

I know what you’re trying to do but it’s not as clever or as smart as you think it is.

Everyone knows Dak walked into a great situation. Like everybody but you I guess.
So now your saying that without Dak and Zeke the team 4 games but with Dak and Zeke the go to 13 games...and this points to Dak being bad how?
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,338
Reaction score
11,290
Are you really arguing that Dak didn’t play in an optimal situation? Really?
Again if the QB position and RB position were what caused the 4 game wins and then what caused the 13 game wins..would that not point to Dak being a major part of the upgrade?
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,338
Reaction score
11,290
I’m saying Dak had as good of a situation as you could be in. It’s not even debatable lol.
Whats debatable is your logic unless you concede Dak was a major part of the upgrade otherwise its plain silly. Again if the RB and QB were the reason for 4 wins and then the reason for 13 wins then how is the QB not a major part of why it turned around?
 

Smith22

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,689
Reaction score
1,327
Because their backup QB was beyond awful and they didn’t have Zeke.

I know what you’re trying to do but it’s not as clever or as smart as you think it is.

Everyone knows Dak walked into a great situation.
Man, I wonder how Trevor Lawrence managed 25 TDs year 2 after joining what most would agree has been a struggling franchise.

Must've been an ideal situation.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,588
Reaction score
86,031
Again if the QB position and RB position were what caused the 4 game wins and then what caused the 13 game wins..would that not point to Dak being a major part of the upgrade?
Dak was a huge upgrade over Romo’s
Backups. Never said he wasn’t.

All I said was that Dak walked into a fantastic situation as a rookie QB. That’s just common sense.

You’re pointing at a previous record and ignoring the talent around him lol.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,588
Reaction score
86,031
Man, I wonder how Trevor Lawrence managed 25 TDs year 2 after joining what most would agree has been a struggling franchise.

Must've been an ideal situation.
Trevor Lawrence might be the most talented QB ever coming into the draft.

Lawrence’s situation as a rookie was the exact opposite of Dak’s in terms of talent around him.
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,235
Reaction score
13,802
I’m not even sure why this is going back and forth. Dak got put in an incredible situation. The 4 wins the year before has nothing to do with this. It’s the product of a bad backup QB and Dez also being hurt. It’s not hard. You have a young top back, a top line, 3 tough WRs and everyone has a healthy year. It was optimal for a rookie. It’s not a slight on him but last year was probably the worst roster. He’s had plenty of talent so far.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,338
Reaction score
11,290
Dak was a huge upgrade over Romo’s
Backups. Never said he wasn’t.

All I said was that Dak walked into a fantastic situation as a rookie QB. That’s just common sense.

You’re pointing at a previous record and ignoring the talent around him lol.
ok i get what your saying, again its the context your trying to put on it.. your trying to say any QB would have thrived on that team when in fact several couldn't, again Dak did alot with that team that year as a rookie throwing shade on it just seems kinda petty. You want to say Dak had a bad year by his standards last year i will FOR SURE agree and that he laid a complete egg in the playoff game against the niners, YES undisputable..but that does not mean that Daniel Jones would have taken the 2016 Cowboys to the same record in his rookie season as Dak made VERY FEW mistakes and Jones made many more in his first several years..Thats what I'm saying..Dak FOR SURE was a major reason that team went from 4 wins to 13 thats undebatable if your talking truthfully.
 
Last edited:

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,500
Reaction score
32,248
Trevor Lawrence might be the most talented QB ever coming into the draft.

Lawrence’s situation as a rookie was the exact opposite of Dak’s in terms of talent around him.
So. You want to go on record talking about Dak walking into an ideal situation but not talk about the situation Lawrence had at Clemson? And the massive drop off you saw when he didnt have one of the most talented teams around him in college history?

Do you listen to yourself when you spew your nonsense? Then again. You are the same guy who said Parsons was Jaylon Smith level talent, and that Brad Kaaya and CJ Beathard were better suited to pro football than Patrick Mahomes. So your judgement is clearly on point!

All QBs need talent around them. Minus 1 maybe 2. Look at the difference adding AJ Brown made for Hurts. Look at the difference Chase made for Burrow. Look at Josh Allen before and after Diggs went to Buffalo.

The whole "needs talent around him" argument for a QB being good is LEAGUE WIDE.
 
Top