nyc;4073434 said:I think Arkin, Nagy, and the job Kowalski didn't against the Vikings along with the hold over from last year Costa is the entire reason Gurode and his fat contract got the boot. We've got a lot of young offensive lineman who are showing that they can play in this league.
Chocolate Lab;4073400 said:If so, that is crazy. Romo isn't on his last legs yet, but he's not a spring chicken anymore either, and there's no way we should be sacrificing any of his prime years for some future hopes.
If this was about some long-range plan, why not draft a center high and let Gurode go next year?
Is Gurode past his prime? Yes. Did he deserve every one of those Pro Bowls? Probably not. But he was also a certified bad-a in college, an all-America four year starter for very good teams in one of the top conferences in the country. He was also one of the best centers in the NFL for years. People acting like an undrafted second year guy is necessarily going to be better than him is wishful thinking at best.
noshame;4073438 said:I'm struggling with the sense of this, either Jerry is truly broke, or a big trade is about to go down.
tupperware;4073380 said:Has anyone else noticed that the underachieving veterans on the offensive side of the ball have been released and the defense has went largely untouched?
noshame;4073438 said:I'm struggling with the sense of this, either Jerry is truly broke, or a big trade is about to go down.
Boston Cowboy;4073402 said:I think the defensive side gets a pass given that they are expected to learn a completely new (and from accounts, complex) scheme. The offense will be utilizing the same framework that it has for the past couple of years. The only difference is that now the OC/HC has a greater influence on who his personnel will be than his predecessor.
burmafrd;4073374 said:Mistake. Unless they badly needed the cap money for something else. Still very questionable.
Romo better have his track shoes on.
Ken;4073429 said:The eagles will not sign Gurode. They love their rookie C and Jamal Jackson is backing him up.
The center is not the problem with their line.
BraveHeartFan;4073445 said:Or they really like the youth they have there instead and have decided it was time to move on.
People have been saying they'd like to see us do more like the Patriots (now by people I don't mean everyone here obviously) and cut loose players BEFORE they go downhill, like Marc did. Well this is one of those types of moves.
BraveHeartFan;4073445 said:Or they really like the youth they have there instead and have decided it was time to move on.
People have been saying they'd like to see us do more like the Patriots (now by people I don't mean everyone here obviously) and cut loose players BEFORE they go downhill, like Marc did. Well this is one of those types of moves.
ScipioCowboy;4073462 said:Not a fan of cutting Gurode, to be perfectly perfectly candid.
However, I'm merely a fan, and I only think year-to-year. I want the Cowboys to field the most competitive team possible each season -- an approach that isn't always in the best long-term interest of the team.
I'm beginning to think that Garrett has assessed this team's potential, and concluded that it isn't playoff-caliber. Consequently, he's making decision to become competitive in future seasons.
Yep. No other explanation. This may be a 4-12 year.ScipioCowboy;4073462 said:Not a fan of cutting Gurode, to be perfectly perfectly candid.
However, I'm merely a fan, and I only think year-to-year. I want the Cowboys to field the most competitive team possible each season -- an approach that isn't always in the best long-term interest of the team.
I'm beginning to think that Garrett has assessed this team's potential, and concluded that it isn't playoff-caliber. Consequently, he's making decision to become competitive in future seasons.
ScipioCowboy;4073462 said:I'm beginning to think that Garrett has assessed this team's potential, and concluded that it isn't playoff-caliber. Consequently, he's making decision to become competitive in future seasons.
juck;4073467 said:Yep. No other explanation. This may be a 4-12 year.
No.stasheroo;4073460 said:It sure was part of the problem on Thursday...
