Guys we had targeted in the draft that we missed by an eyelash?

[speedkilz88]

Or a second & a fourth? Or 2 seconds (2010 & 2011)? Or a 2nd, Proctor and a starter (Ellis?)?


I think there is some trade flexibility w/out having to sacrifice a first. Just my opinion. What does it hurt to ask?

A first next year is equivalent to a second this year. See some of the Patriots trades for an example of trading their second for a first next year. But since the Seahawks like the guy the only incentive for them to trade him is if you knock their socks off with a first and extra. It really makes no sense to even think we should try anything like that.

 

[Tobal]

OK what pisses me off is we need a damn nickle safety........ especially a smart one with ballhawk skills.

Nah the Dallas defense hasn't been missing that... cough

 

[Chocolate Lab]

OK what pisses me off is we need a damn nickle safety........ especially a smart one with ballhawk skills.

Nah the Dallas defense hasn't been missing that... cough

That's exactly what Smith is...

 

[Idgit]

That's exactly what Smith is...

I think he was saying he's pissed because that's what we needed, and then we took one. So there's not that much else to ***** about.

I suggest backup nosetackle or backup center. Or go the comfortable route and pile on the probowl QB not being elite enough.

EDIT: Tobal, that reads as a shot at you, which wasn't intended. I'm just mocking the board tendencies in general.