AtlCB
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,860
- Reaction score
- 110
gimmesix;3183143 said:Details, details.
Greg Ellis was cut by the Cowboys.
gimmesix;3183143 said:Details, details.
AtlCB;3183141 said:#6 - You may want to re-word this one. We still have no depth on the OL. Free was definity a nice surprise. After he played so bad in preseason, I though he would still need another year or two to develop. We would be in bad shape if he didn't turn the corner. With Columbo injured, we still have no depth anywhere on the OL. Does anyone actually want to see McQuistan, Preston, Proctor, or Holland see any significant playing time???
AtlCB;3183149 said:Greg Ellis was cut by the Cowboys.
gimmesix;3183083 said:1) Keith Brooking is washed up and a bad free agent signing
I remember several on the boards I visit wanted to pay an exorbitant amount to sign Ray Lewis instead.
2) A kicker? Why in the world is Dallas drafting a kicker?
When Dallas selected David Buehler, the boos were plentiful for the Cowboys. Some didn't understand the purpose of having a second kicker; some simply didn't want Dallas to waste a second roster spot on a kickoff specialist.
3) No way Miles Austin should be relied upon to fill Terrell Owens' shoes.
I have to admit that I thought getting rid of Owens without signing a proven replacement was a bad idea. Many of us liked what we had seen of Austin in a limited role, but just were unsure it was smart to lay all hopes on him coming through in a starting role.
4) Orlando Scandrick should be the starting cornerback ahead of Mike Jenkins.
Many wrote of Jenkins pretty much based on his ole´ tackle against the Giants last year. They were absolutely sure that Scandrick should get the starting role after Anthony Henry was traded.
5) Cutting Greg Ellis isn't a good idea because Anthony Spencer's not good enough.
I'm not sure many were really against getting rid of Ellis because of his whining, but many felt Spencer couldn't get the job done.
6) Dallas has no depth on the offensive line.
Although Doug Free is a young lineman from a smaller program, many had already written him off as a bust before he really got a chance to prove himself. The same will probably be done with Robert Brewster, if it hasn't already.
The point of this is that every time a player has a bad play or game or doesn't immediately live up to expectations we want to bench him or cut him or call him a bust. Sometimes we might end up being right, but often we are wrong ... and if we just have patience and let things develop, we'll be rewarded as fans.
It amazes me how fast some fans attack a member of our team, when what fans are supposed to do is root, root, root for the home team. There is nothing wrong with critical analysis, but negativism is not critical analysis.
We need to stop jumping to conclusions and realize there are reasons the starters are the starters, maybe there are things the coaching staff sees in practice that tells them this player or this play will work the best. We need to stop jumping to conclusions in assuming that players this team has brought in won't eventually work out.
I know it won't happen because we live in an impatient society, but I just had to get on my soapbox for a minute. Thanks for listening.
gimmesix;3183159 said:I'm not that concerned about Holland, because he's done well before. Proctor seems to do better at center than at guard, and Preston was a vet picked up for some insurance. I'm not sure about him simply because I haven't seen him.
Just like many were panicking about Free, I think we could be overreacting if we assume one of these others couldn't handle significant playing time. ... I never want to see Proctor at guard again, though. He proved that he's a liability there and it would surprise me if he could do any better now.
7footer;3183181 said:I'm still not sure #6 is wrong yet though either, as having one qualified back-up in Free doesn't necessarily provide adequate depth. However, I like that Brewster will be available for us to look at next season, and Travis Bright who's currently on our practice squad should be able to beat out McQuistan for a spot on our roster next year...He was very impressive in pre-season!
AtlCB;3183187 said:Montrae Holland started a few games last season and was pathetic. Proctor was horrible at center and is now third string behind Preston. Duke Preston is the only real unknown on the line. He started 11 games last year for Buffalo, so he could be a decent backup.
Idgit;3183185 said:Of your list, the closest I come is thinking cutting Ellis was a bad idea, but it wasn't b/c I thought Spencer wouldn't be good enough. It was b/c I didn't want to go through the year with only two experienced OLBs in our 3-4. And I still think we took an unnecessary risk. No matter how you slice it, though, this was the right year to start Spencer, and that was pretty obvious, I think.
gimmesix;3183214 said:I was there with you on the risk. We were essentially counting on two rookies who were making the transition from DE. I understood the move, but it worried me from a backup standpoint.
I have to give Butler some credit for his play, but I'd still be very concerned if we lost either starter.
Chris in SoCal;3183264 said:#1 and #6 for me although I'm still rolling with #6. One man (Free) does not amount to OL depth. Cory Procter and Pat McQuistan are still garbage sauce and Montrae Holland and Duke Preston can't even make the active roster over those 2.
Counting on Brewster and 1 or 2 2010 draftees to improve OL depth.
Idgit;3183268 said:Props to Butler for the big plays he's made, but it's clear Wade still thinks he can be exploited. We're thinner at OLB than we should be.
gimmesix;3183083 said:Although I'm sure I've missed some, these are several of the conclusions fans have jumped to during the course of this year. Are you guilty of any of these?
1) Keith Brooking is washed up and a bad free agent signing
I remember several on the boards I visit wanted to pay an exorbitant amount to sign Ray Lewis instead.
2) A kicker? Why in the world is Dallas drafting a kicker?
When Dallas selected David Buehler, the boos were plentiful for the Cowboys. Some didn't understand the purpose of having a second kicker; some simply didn't want Dallas to waste a second roster spot on a kickoff specialist.
3) No way Miles Austin should be relied upon to fill Terrell Owens' shoes.
I have to admit that I thought getting rid of Owens without signing a proven replacement was a bad idea. Many of us liked what we had seen of Austin in a limited role, but just were unsure it was smart to lay all hopes on him coming through in a starting role.
4) Orlando Scandrick should be the starting cornerback ahead of Mike Jenkins.
Many wrote off Jenkins pretty much based on his ole´ tackle against the Giants last year. They were absolutely sure that Scandrick should get the starting role after Anthony Henry was traded.
5) Cutting Greg Ellis isn't a good idea because Anthony Spencer's not good enough.
I'm not sure many were really against getting rid of Ellis because of his whining, but many felt Spencer couldn't get the job done.
6) Dallas has no depth on the offensive line.
Although Doug Free is a young lineman from a smaller program, many had already written him off as a bust before he really got a chance to prove himself. The same will probably be done with Robert Brewster, if it hasn't already.
Preacha Mane;3183278 said:great thread man!!!!!
And I honestly think this is whats happening with the whole Roy Williams bashing, but as with all things, only time will tell.