Eskimo said:
Whoever messed up Henson's delivery over the summer should be canned. His accuracy was very good last year and I don't recall an inordinate amount of knocked down passes. He threw no ducks and had excellent velocity. I really think they set out and fixed a problem that didn't really exist.
Actually I think its a sign of the long-term strategy in place with Henson.
When they decided to make the switch, they HAD to know Drew wasn't going to be 100% comfortable with it going into camp.
However, they also knew that next year he should be, and will be a better QB down the road for having made the correction.
The 'advantage' of signing a QB like Drew "on the cheap" is you are not forced to throw him out on the field no matter what because of what you are paying him, al la Eli last year. It is one of the few opportunities you will ever have to develop a potential #1 talent at a reasonable pace, and I have always liked the move for its pro-activeness.
The fact that they altered his mechanics in the offseason shows that next year was always going to be Drew's litmus year from day one, not this year. If they were counting on him to be anything this year they wouldn't have messed with him, IMO.
Lastly, I didn't really think Drew's problems against Seattle were arm or mechanics related. On the INT he simply didn't recognize the coverage (although, for everyone harping on him, if you watch that play again Witten was his 3rd check down - enough with the 'focus' on 1 receiver nonsense). He has far better pocket awareness then Hutch ever did, but he still showed some happy feet and made a few poor decisions.
Drew will get his shot to compete next year, and if he shows the same progress and comfort going forward in comfort with the offense and confidence in the pocket that Romo has showed from year 2 to year 3, we are all going to be very happy IMO.