cowboys5xsbs
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,882
- Reaction score
- 20,355
One step closer to the National Flag Football League.
1) I would think players would be FOR as much player safety as possibleI would argue that its sad Professionals cant figure out how to tackle up high without dropping their hips
Paid all that money, grown man, and you cant figure it out?
No one wants their leg snapped. If a play that increases the frequency of a leg being snapped and that play be removed without messing the game up...you do it.
Defenders should stop tackling up high, especially when trailing from behind. And...if they do...using every ounce of their weight to bring the ball carrier down without using their own legs to prevent an injury to the other player...is kinda barbaric.
There are guys tackling and reaching and pulling for the ball to cause fumbles....but they cant tackle and remember to do something else to prevent injuries? They can only multitask when it suits your argument, right? Convenient
I'm with you in that if you can eliminate the tackle without messing up the game you do it. I think eliminating that tackle is going to be more difficult than we think though in relation to keeping a balance between offense and defense in the league. I don't care how much these guys are getting paid it becomes extremely difficult to tackle Derrick Henry from behind, or even a Tony Pollard in the open field.I would argue that its sad Professionals can't figure out how to tackle up high without dropping their hips
Paid all that money, grown man, and you cant figure it out?
No one wants their leg snapped. If a play that increases the frequency of a leg being snapped and that play be removed without messing the game up...you do it.
Defenders should stop tackling up high, especially when trailing from behind. And...if they do...using every ounce of your weight to bring them down without using their own legs to prevent an injury to the other player...is kinda barbaric.
There are guys tackling and reaching and pulling for the ball to cause fumbles....but they cant tackle and remember to do something else to prevent injuries? They can only multitask when it suits your argument, right? Convenient
Did the horse-collar rule ruin anything? Not at all.They’re going to make it impossible to play defense and make a legal tackle.
There’s been several more rule changes on tackling since the horse collar tackle. At some point it’s going to ruin the game for some fans. I understand they’re trying to make the game more safe, but you can’t handcuff defenders, making it more difficult to make a legal tackle. Tackling requires reacting quickly. Now you can’t hit high or low or land on a QB using your body weight. It’s getting ridiculous. It’s making it more difficult to play defense.Did the horse-collar rule ruin anything? Not at all.
The tackle up high, jump up, use every single ounce of your weight...and drop to the ground, most likely falling on a ball carriers legs is just a new derivative of the horse-collar. Its a ball carriers getting ripped backwards while a defender is falling on their legs.
Get it out of the game. No one wants a leg snapped
Eventually it’ll become like the Pro Bowl as it transitioned.One step closer to the National Flag Football League.
No one wants to touch this one. Convenient. YawnIts funny.
I know exactly what is causing the injuries and I would never suit up on a defense and try and tackle like that.
But it is being defended as some impossible rule to implement, that will ruin the game and yada yada yada.
I could easily play defense and never horse collar or tackle up high and drop my hips on a ball carriers legs. Easily.
Yet the fake system just wants lie and argue that it will ruin the game or cant be done. Yawn. Same lies promoting negativity to cause a reaction. Its all fake.
Why would they? You've stated your opinion and it's clear that you aren't going to budge on the subject. I agree with you that they can probably figure out a way to get the hip drop tackle out of the game without much of an issue, but it's far from being as cut and dry as you make it out to be.No one wants to touch this one. Convenient. Yawn
Im saying I know how to tackle high and not drop on some ones legs JUST LIKE HOW DEFENDERS TACKLE AND TRY AND RIP BALL LOOSE. Im highlighting that players multitask while tackling...they can multi-task and not drop tackle.Why would they? You've stated your opinion and it's clear that you aren't going to budge on the subject. I agree with you that they can probably figure out a way to get the hip drop tackle out of the game without much of an issue, but it's far from being as cut and dry as you make it out to be.
You would never horse collar tackle? I would agree with that, it's a pretty easy one to stay away from. You would never tackle high? Then you wouldn't be a very good tackler, and if your strategy is to take out the legs you're going to cause more injuries. I guarantee 9/10 skill players would rather a defender hit them high than low. You injure a rib you're out a month, injure your ACL and your career could be finished.
The hip drop sounds like an easy tackle to stay away from, but the reality is if you're a defender on 3rd down and ball carrier is close to the LOS you're instinct is to do everything in your power to not let that player fall forward. I'm all for making a rule change in the name of player safety, but you've got to give me a technique that can be used instead. What we can't do is completely outlaw tackling from behind in a pulling motion. I think that either a firm alternative technique needs to be established or we need to be specific on what a penalty would be, and it has to specifically be around dropping the hips with intent. It can't just be anything that looks ugly or gets every borderline call like they are doing with QB roughing.