Velvet Jones
New Member
- Messages
- 1,098
- Reaction score
- 0
percyhoward;2312771 said:Quick, who's the all-time meaningful sacks leader?
lmao!!
percyhoward;2312771 said:Quick, who's the all-time meaningful sacks leader?
Aven8;2312627 said:Uhhh NO.....we were up by 9 with 1:40 to play, and they had no timeouts.
goshan;2312784 said:I still love him - but his pressures are probably down.
Anyone have that stat?
AdamJT13;2312833 said:The coaches credited him with 27 pressures last season (plus 14 sacks).
Going into the Bengals game, the coaches had him with six pressures this season -- on pace for 24 pressures (plus 16 sacks).
Considering that our opponents had almost 10 percent fewer pass plays per game through four games than they did last season, his pressures are about the same and his sacks are up.
Velvet Jones;2312896 said:But in 2007, it was 22 meaningful pressures and 12 meaningful sacks. At this rate, he is only good for 17 meaningful pressures and 7 meaningful sacks! That is not acceptable!
jimnabby;2312707 said:Ask and you shall receive...
CLE: 4th quarter, 11:10 remaining, 3rd-and-11, Dallas up 28-10
PHI: 4th quarter, 1:23 remaining, 3rd-and-13, Dallas up 41-37
GB: 4th quarter, 0:36 remaining, 2nd-and-10, Dallas up 27-16
WAS: 1st quarter, 3:35 remaining, 3rd-and-7, scoreless
CIN: 4th quarter, 1:44 remaining, 2nd-and-10, Dallas up 31-22
So, two out of his five sacks (PHI and WAS) have been pretty significant, while the other three were pretty well garbage time sacks. OF course, for there to be garbage time sacks, there has to be garbage time, and Ware was a pretty big part of the reason that the D dominated both CLE and GB, in particular.