Robster8989
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 447
- Reaction score
- 540
In the Jaguars game, we platooned Tyron and Peters at RT.
I don't know the snap count or the sequence, but it seemed that Tyron started, and got 2 or 3 series, then Peters came in and took a series. That gave Tyron some rest and allowed him to remain fresh.
I wonder why we went away from that in the Eagles game.
Did Peters get any series resting Tyron?
In the offseason, most of us understood Tyron's limitations, namely, injuries.
I wanted us to sign Peters in the off season, and platoon him with Tyron (like we did in the Jags game, but at LT).
I thought platooning him like that would cut down on the chance of injury for Tyron, and I honnestly couldn't believe Peters was out there unsigned (and apparently just looking for a minimum contract). He played really well for the Bears last year. Of course, Tyron went down in preseaon and we ended up signing Peters anyways, so my plan would have been moot, but we would have had Peters in camp and in game shape from the start. If we can bring Peters back at a min. contract, I hope we do so. That dude has limitations for sure, but he is a cagey vet and is still as strong as a bull, and he can sub at different positions. A perfect "6th starter on the OL".
If we do keep Tyron next year, I hope we also keep Peters, and platoon them.
I don't know the snap count or the sequence, but it seemed that Tyron started, and got 2 or 3 series, then Peters came in and took a series. That gave Tyron some rest and allowed him to remain fresh.
I wonder why we went away from that in the Eagles game.
Did Peters get any series resting Tyron?
In the offseason, most of us understood Tyron's limitations, namely, injuries.
I wanted us to sign Peters in the off season, and platoon him with Tyron (like we did in the Jags game, but at LT).
I thought platooning him like that would cut down on the chance of injury for Tyron, and I honnestly couldn't believe Peters was out there unsigned (and apparently just looking for a minimum contract). He played really well for the Bears last year. Of course, Tyron went down in preseaon and we ended up signing Peters anyways, so my plan would have been moot, but we would have had Peters in camp and in game shape from the start. If we can bring Peters back at a min. contract, I hope we do so. That dude has limitations for sure, but he is a cagey vet and is still as strong as a bull, and he can sub at different positions. A perfect "6th starter on the OL".
If we do keep Tyron next year, I hope we also keep Peters, and platoon them.