How long do we wait to draft a RB?

For the record, I firmly believe a RB round 1 is a waste when you can get above average starter later and pick a starter at another position in round 1.

RBs are everywhere nowadays.
100% on point. Is Jeanty going to get 5ypc minimum?
 
Here is the list of prospects with a grade of 6.10 or higher. The grading scale is included. The teams I believe need to draft a RB are the Raiders, Bears, Steelers, Jags, Broncos, and us. This list is taken from NFL.com and does not include the NextGen scores. Who would you be happy with? Can we grab a quality RB in the 3rd round?

Prospects
Grade
PositionClass

Ashton Jeanty
Boise State
7.15RBJunior

TreVeyon Henderson
Ohio State
6.38RBSenior

Omarion Hampton
North Carolina
6.35RBJunior

Dylan Sampson
Tennessee
6.33RBJunior

Quinshon Judkins
Ohio State
6.30RBJunior

Bhayshul Tuten
Virginia Tech
6.29RBSenior

Kaleb Johnson
Iowa
6.21RBJunior

Jacory Croskey-Merritt
Arizona
6.18RBSenior

Jordan James
Oregon
6.17RBJunior

Cam Skattebo
Arizona State
6.16RBSenior

Trevor Etienne
Georgia
6.15RBJunior

Woody Marks
USC
6.15RBSenior

Jarquez Hunter
Auburn
6.12RBSenior

Jaydon Blue
Texas
6.11RBJunior

Lan Larison
UC Davis
6.10RBSenior

GRADE

8.0
The perfect prospect
7.3-7.5
Perennial All-Pro
7.0-7.1
Pro Bowl talent
6.7-6.9
Year 1 starter
6.5-6.6
Boom-or-bust potential
6.40-6.49
Will become good starter within two years
6.30-6.39
Will eventually be plus starter
6.20-6.29
Will eventually be average starter
6.10-6.19
Good backup with the potential to develop into starter
6.0-6.09
Traits or talent to be above-average backup
5.80-5.99
Average backup or special-teamer
5.60-5.69
Candidate for bottom of roster or practice squad
5.50-5.59
Priority undrafted free agent
So unless we draft Jeanty, the best we can hope for is a RB who "will EVENTUALLY be a Plus starter". Not even a Good starter & will probably take more than 2 years to do that.

Is this grading really accurate? I thought this class was better than that.
 
So unless we draft Jeanty, the best we can hope for is a RB who "will EVENTUALLY be a Plus starter". Not even a Good starter & will probably take more than 2 years to do that.

Is this grading really accurate? I thought this class was better than that.
Projecting a career is hard and riddled with error. A grade doesn't consider the attitude and drive of the player. Trent Richardson was considered a Pro Bowl player but busted hard. Jordan Mailata's draft profile put him at candidate for bottom of roster or practice squad but just was named 2nd team AP. But the draft profile did say Richardson had "much of his production were yards on plays in a good scheme with a seam and an opportunity to get to linebacker and safety level without much trouble. He may have more trouble getting to the perimeter at the next level and won't beat fast outside linebackers on angles alone," while the profile on Mailata said "Big dude, athletic. Someone will draft him late and he's a project, but very much a freak athlete for his size."

Yeah, it's a crap shoot for sure. You do the research and make the best educated pick you can.
 
So unless we draft Jeanty, the best we can hope for is a RB who "will EVENTUALLY be a Plus starter". Not even a Good starter & will probably take more than 2 years to do that.

Is this grading really accurate? I thought this class was better than that.
It's extremely sketchy imo. Not sure how he has some names on this list ahead of others not even listed.
 
I would trade back if possible to 15-20 range. Then focus on WR/CB in round 1 and 2. Then RB/DT in 3 and 4. Get another RB in 5/6.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,934
Messages
13,839,175
Members
23,782
Latest member
Cowboyfan4ver
Back
Top