BrAinPaiNt;1097285 said:Agreed...if the offer was well worth it. I would trade trade away.
However it's not gonna happen and we would not get something that would be better to us anyways.
Hostile;1097277 said:It would depend on what we got in return. If Oakland offered it's 1st rounder and I had a shot at a top 5 pick, I wouldn't mind one little bit.
Incorrect. It was supposedly the Jets, there was no other pick involved, and it has never been proven though held onto firmly by the one journalist from either city who reported it.TheKey;1097291 said:We already turned down a 3rd rounder and another undisclosed pick from NO.
Hostile;1097290 said:Hypothetically if Oakland gave us their #1 for Romo who would we get to backup Bledsoe?
If the answer is Vinny Testa-saurus I might seriously change my mind about doing it.
Hostile;1097277 said:It would depend on what we got in return. If Oakland offered it's 1st rounder and I had a shot at a top 5 pick, I wouldn't mind one little bit.
Hostile;1097290 said:Hypothetically if Oakland gave us their #1 for Romo who would we get to backup Bledsoe?
If the answer is Vinny Testa-saurus I might seriously change my mind about doing it.
Jay;1097448 said:Worst thread I've ever seen in the history of cowboys zone, bar none.
Though, if a crappy team is going to offer their 1st, I'd have to oblige and go for it.
I did what?Angus;1097381 said:Are you a secret Raider fan Hostile. Why are you willing to give them the far best deal? And for a chance at a quarterback who has never thrown a pass in a real NFL game? I thought that was your reason for sticking with Bledsoe.
cowboys#1;1097029 said:i think it wont happen. we all know how much BP loves bledsoe, he might have gotten angry when the fans booed his loverboy on sunday. but seriously , do you think romo is trade bait?
Okay, you convinced me. Now convince Al "The Crypt Keeper" Davis.Arch Stanton;1097437 said:For a realistic shot at Brady Quinn or Calvin Johnson in years draft?
I'd take Vinny as backup in a heartbeat.