CouchCoach
Staff member
- Messages
- 41,122
- Reaction score
- 74,904
There are two factors that we do not consider and one specifically affects QB's, ego.
Money is the pecking order, it isn't All Pro or the pro bowl, it is money because it's all made public. Some players have it in their contract that no player at their position can be paid more. That one little clause cost the Seahawks Steve Hutchinson who signed a contract with MN that stated if any other G was paid more, his 49M contract would be fully guaranteed. SEA got their revenge when they signed Walter Jones to a higher contract and MN had to release Hutchinson as that would have wrecked their cap.
And let's take the other issue, the owner. Why in the hell should Prescott even consider taking less than the max he can get from an owner that makes sure the price of his toys, 250M boat, is made public? Think these players don't know how their owners live? Why should they cut them a deal?
But the biggest reason not to take a team friendly deal is that with this brain trust none of them knows if that even benefits the team. Give them a deal and what if they use that on jag's or not at all?
When Hines Ward last contract was up, there were PIT players petitioning the Rooney's to keep him, he represented the heart and soul of that team. But not one player offered to take a cut to keep him.
We are a take care of #1 society and nothing portrays that better than professional sports. This country worships capitalism, why should they be any different? Of course, an athlete can support his family on 30M just as well as 35M, that's not the point. The "family" is the smokescreen that is convenient. Ego keeps the score, every player knows what every other player at his position is making and if he forgets, he has his agent to remind him. Agents are ego pumpers.
Money is the pecking order, it isn't All Pro or the pro bowl, it is money because it's all made public. Some players have it in their contract that no player at their position can be paid more. That one little clause cost the Seahawks Steve Hutchinson who signed a contract with MN that stated if any other G was paid more, his 49M contract would be fully guaranteed. SEA got their revenge when they signed Walter Jones to a higher contract and MN had to release Hutchinson as that would have wrecked their cap.
And let's take the other issue, the owner. Why in the hell should Prescott even consider taking less than the max he can get from an owner that makes sure the price of his toys, 250M boat, is made public? Think these players don't know how their owners live? Why should they cut them a deal?
But the biggest reason not to take a team friendly deal is that with this brain trust none of them knows if that even benefits the team. Give them a deal and what if they use that on jag's or not at all?
When Hines Ward last contract was up, there were PIT players petitioning the Rooney's to keep him, he represented the heart and soul of that team. But not one player offered to take a cut to keep him.
We are a take care of #1 society and nothing portrays that better than professional sports. This country worships capitalism, why should they be any different? Of course, an athlete can support his family on 30M just as well as 35M, that's not the point. The "family" is the smokescreen that is convenient. Ego keeps the score, every player knows what every other player at his position is making and if he forgets, he has his agent to remind him. Agents are ego pumpers.