How much better would we be with Brockers, Wagner and Warford?

keds

Active Member
Messages
454
Reaction score
114
... versus having Escobar and Claiborne...

Would it make much difference given everything else were the same?
 

Picksix

A Work in Progress
Messages
5,198
Reaction score
1,081
Hard to say. On paper, we would likely be better. But like a lot of other comparison-based threads, you could substitute any of our picks for players we could've taken instead. I've wondered the same things myself, though.
 
Messages
18,222
Reaction score
28,531
Every team in the NFL can look back at drafts and wish they'd done something different at some point. They can all find guys they passed on or could have chosen had they not traded a pick.

It's all a fruitless exercise.
 

keds

Active Member
Messages
454
Reaction score
114
Every team in the NFL can look back at drafts and wish they'd done something different at some point. They can all find guys they passed on or could have chosen had they not traded a pick.

It's all a fruitless exercise.

In hindsight these three players would have addressed major need areas...
 

TwoCentPlain

Numbnuts
Messages
15,171
Reaction score
11,084
How much better would we have been if we only would have drafted Tom Brady in the 5th round?
Would we have won a super bowl if we only would have drafted Randy Moss instead of that DL who's name I already forgot?
 

CaptainMorgan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,109
Reaction score
586
If one can coach one can GM and one can be a personal trainer I think we would be better.

Otherwise we would still suck.
 

Denim Chicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,683
Reaction score
24,569
Well, huh, might as, might as well ask why is a tree good? Why is the sunset good? Why are boobs good?
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,859
... versus having Escobar and Claiborne...

Would it make much difference given everything else were the same?

I think the moral here is quantity over quantity is the remedy for a middling talent base.

We lost a top 50 pick to get Claiborne. The trade down worked wonders for us. An 8-8 team should never ever trade up.
 

Zordon

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,291
Reaction score
46,647
if we bring it up immediately after the draft, we're told to stop jumping the gun.

if we bring it up 3 years after the draft, we're told to stop living in the past.

when is the appropriate time to bring up draft failures without the purpose being questioned?
 

rbr651

Active Member
Messages
696
Reaction score
61
I think the moral here is quantity over quantity is the remedy for a middling talent base.

We lost a top 50 pick to get Claiborne. The trade down worked wonders for us. An 8-8 team should never ever trade up.

I would say an 8-8 team should rarely trade up, I would of been happy to trade up for Luck even with as much as I like Tony. I think there are certain players that you have to brake the bank for within reason, and I don't think CB is one of those positions in which you do it.
 

sbark

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,214
Reaction score
4,408
if we bring it up immediately after the draft, we're told to stop jumping the gun.

if we bring it up 3 years after the draft, we're told to stop living in the past.

when is the appropriate time to bring up draft failures without the purpose being questioned?

..........when the players we are rueing about make the HOF........and by then the youngsters reading the forum don't know who the H#ll we are talking about.
 
Top