Hunkering down with a statistically brilliant QB who's a loser

GimmeTheBall!;4354975 said:
Lissen, Blutto, it was Gimme here who was lamenting our secondary all during preseason and into the season.
To mention the secondary is a given. Any dummy (even you) can see that.

What I am addressing is a QB who has hero status throughout the season and is statistically brilliant yet lets us down ever time.

Let us stick to the issue at hand -- that be Romo, and not swerve onto already plowed land about the O line and the secondary and the lack of a defensive rush aside from Ware.

I hope yourn reading comprhension improves this coming year, Dome.

We are the only team that a has a QB with 20+ TDs to INTs not in the playoffs this eyar. When Arron Rodger's back up can put up nearly 500 yards passing and 5 TDs, then either the Packers have their own version of Tom Brady sitting on the sideline or they are a heck of a lot better team than we are.

Isn't there something fundamentally wrong when Romo is the 4th highest rated QB and Ware was a 1/2 sack away from being the only player to EVER reach 20 sacks twice and yet every time we lose someone bemoans that either Romo or Ware didn't do enough for us to win.

That simply means we don't have a team around our few exceptional players to win games. We have zero depth, so if our starters go down like on the O-line then we simply fall apart. Go look at our drafting the last 15 years and it is awful. That is the source of our woos.
 
Arkyvarminter;4356746 said:
In the past I have been hard on Romo but have learned that all the great QB's have bad games. I think Romo matured alot this year and carried the team. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but I don't think Eli is as good as Romo, I just don't. Romo has better numbers but Eli has something even better. He has better playcalling, better Running backs, ours are always hurt, a better O line and a better head coach who has been there and done that. Lets face it, Eli just has a better supporting cast all the way around and thats why he has went farther than Romo up to this point.

I am a Romo supporter and believe he is a top 10 QB. He can take us to the SB.

At the same time I think Eli has grown up this year and played like it. This last game he easily out performed Romo. Throw statistics out the door. I watch Eli side step pass rush and complete passes after passes with small windows (ok our DB sucks too). He also knew when to throw the ball away (Romo didn't do that well this game). I came away impressed with Eli and I believe Eli is a better QB than Romo by a little (oh my god I said it!).
 
Bleu Star;4356795 said:
I am going to refrain from my desire to fall in line and post yet another short appropriate witty response. Instead, I will try to respond on the straight & narrow.

I have been one of the biggest Romo detractors over the years leading up to the second half of last season. I have seen Romo go from the super talented goat to what we have in front of us today. That is a guy who has weathered many a storm with assaults originating both on the field and in the media circles. The guy is battle tested and has never once given up. I have said it before but it bears mention once more. Romo cannot do it alone. If he is asked to take the field and bail us out of every series with a miracle, he will fail. Hell... most starting QBs will fail at the thought of having to do what Romo does regularly. He makes it look easy and my guess is that we are going to one day look back at his tenure with heavy hearts when we do eventually part ways with him. Let me say it again.. If you rely on your QB to save the day practically every time he takes the field, you are setting your team up for failure. The key for us will be the continued development of that young oline along with the re-emergence of DeMarco next year (aka Balance). Compliment Romo with solid protection and a "reliable" running game... then sit back and enjoy the success.

Romo is not the problem. Get a defense out there that knows how to flourish in the 3-4 set. Raise the intelligence level of the defense overall by cutting some dead weight. Focus on the actual problem by letting Rob put "his" defense together. Then sit back and enjoy while our high powered offense puts games out of reach by the 4th quarter.

This post pretty much sums it all up
 
ufcrules1;4356728 said:
Eli is the better QB and he will go down in history that way too unless some miracle happens in Dallas. Romo will be remembered for choking when it counted with some decent stats. Eli will be remembered for winning a super bowl.

That's because sports fans are mostly mouth breathers and idiots who listen to meathead sports talk radio. Three weeks ago most of them had convinced themselves that Tim Tebow had some magical mystery "winner" power that causes Prater to hit 60 yard field goals and Marion Barber to run out of bounds. True story.

There's a reason why Pardon the Interruption is one of ESPN's most popular shows. It's not because the average sports fan enjoys a highly developed sense of logic and nuance.
 
btcutter;4356811 said:
I am a Romo supporter and believe he is a top 10 QB. He can take us to the SB.

At the same time I think Eli has grown up this year and played like it. This last game he easily out performed Romo. Throw statistics out the door. I watch Eli side step pass rush and complete passes after passes with small windows (ok our DB sucks too). He also knew when to throw the ball away (Romo didn't do that well this game). I came away impressed with Eli and I believe Eli is a better QB than Romo by a little (oh my god I said it!).

Thanks for being honest. Nice truthful post. It is painful to say Eli is better, but it's the truth.
 
InmanRoshi;4356922 said:
That's because sports fans are mostly mouth breathers and idiots who listen to meathead sports talk radio. Three weeks ago most of them had convinced themselves that Tim Tebow had some magical mystery "winner" power that causes Prater to hit 60 yard field goals and Marion Barber to run out of bounds. True story.

There's a reason why Pardon the Interruption is one of ESPN's most popular shows. It's not because the average sports fan enjoys highly developed logic and nuance.

:bow:
 
ufcrules1;4356923 said:
Thanks for being honest. Nice truthful post. It is painful to say Eli is better, but it's the truth.

Very painful... As a matter of fact, I can't even say it. I will say that Eli did an admirable job of carving our defense up for the vast majority of that game. I was sadly impressed (yes very conflicted) by his efforts...
 
ufcrules1;4356728 said:
Eli is the better QB and he will go down in history that way too unless some miracle happens in Dallas. Romo will be remembered for choking when it counted with some decent stats. Eli will be remembered for winning a super bowl.

Hahaha....rex grossman has been to the super bowl, and also has more playoff wins? Is he also better than Tony Romo? How good was Trent dilfer?

People remember history as they want. Nobody remembers Petrine early strugles which were hardly his fault. I think it was 5 first round exits in the playoffs?

At least Tony throws the ball with his eyes open.

Eli wasn't Pressured and our secondary was poor.

Our o-line is Tonys issue
 
You've been watching to much ESPN/NFL Network my friend
 
berneydidnotread.gif
 
Judas;4355342 said:
You don't think Roethlisberger ran for his life in some of those play off games? How much did New England's defense pitch in or New Orleans or Green bay's defense pitch in to help them win? You need to come out of your little tiny world you live in and see more than the love you have for a lguy who can't get it done.

No Super Bowl-winning QB has ever truly carried his team there. Do you even know how much those guys weigh? :D

I won't even go into Roethlisberger's first championship (2005 season) - that should be obvious to anyone with a memory. But, leading up to Roethlisberger's second Super Bowl (2008 season) their defense was ranked 1st overall, 1st vs. pass, 2nd vs. run, 51 sacks, 20 INT, 9 FR. They held fourteen of their sixteen regular season opponents under 300 yards of total offense - and half of them to 10 points or less. Now THAT'S defense. And Roethlisberger? 17 TD, 15 INT, 46 sacks - passer rating 80.1 (24th).

In an AFCDG the Steelers beat the Chargers 35-24... awesome Big Ben, right? Wrong. He went 17/26 for 181 yards and 1 TD (0 INT). Fortunately for them, Santonio Holmes had a 67-yard punt return for a TD - and Willie Parker rang up 146 on 27 carries with two of the Steelers' three rushing TDs on the day. Although the Steelers' defense did yield 308 yards and 3 TDs to Phillip Rivers - much of that came after the Chargers found themselves trailing 28-10 less than one minute into the 4th quarter. The Steelers' D also picked off Rivers once, sacked him four times, and allowed the Chargers a paltry 15 yards rushing.

In the AFCCG the Steelers beat the Ravens 23-14. Roethlisberger was 16/33 for 255, 1 TD, 0 INT, 4 sacks - nothing to write home about. However, his Ravens' counterpart Joe Flacco had a terrible day at the office. Flacco was 13/30, 141 yards, 3 sacks, 3 INT - with the second a 40-yard 'pick 6' returned by Troy Polamalu. Both the Ravens TDs came from Willis McGahee (60 yards on 20 carries, 1 lost fumble). Steelers also added FGs of 34, 42, and 46 yards.

In Super Bowl XLIII Roethlisberger went 21/30, 256, 1 TD, 1 INT - 5 of 7, 74 yards, and his lone TD coming as 'Big Ben' did the dink-and-dunk thing on the game winning 78-yard drive. He attempted one deep pass (incomplete) during that drive. Everything else was a short ball - one of which Santonio Holmes happened to run 40 yards with to the Arizona 6. And, while Ben's 6-yard corner endzone pass was well-placed, it required an amazing job of body-control and concentration for Holmes to haul it in for the winning TD. Which is just part of the reason Holmes, not Roethlisberger, was named the game MVP. Another being James Harrison's return of Kurt Warner's lone INT of the day right before halftime - talk about huge. Heck, it could easily argued that Warner outplayed Roethlisberger - going 31 of 43, 377 yards, 3 TD, and 1 INT despite going up against the league's top-ranked defense. Prior to the game winning drive Roethlisberger was 16 of 23 for 182 yards, 0 TD, and 1 INT. Santonio Holmes should get a Christmas card from Big Ben every year - include some cash in it, too. Because he and the Steelers defense are more responsible for his 'big game' reputation than Roethlisberger is.



In Tom Brady's first Superbowl win (XXXVI, 20-17 over the Rams) he threw for all of 145 yds, 16 of 27, 1 TD, 0 INT. But his defense contributed three sacks, a fumble recovery, and two INTs - one of which was returned 58 yards for a TD. And Vinatieri had the game winning FG with 00:06 left.

In the Divisional round Brady threw for over 300 yards in the snow (0 TD, 1 INT). But their defense held the Raiders to 230 net yards and 13 points (1 sack, 0 INT, 0 FR) - Vinatieri going 3/3 on FGs, including the 23-yard game winner in OT . Final: 16-13 Patriots.

In the AFCCG, Brady was 12/18 for 115 yards (0 TD, 0 INT) before being knocked out of the game (just before halftime) on the Steelers second sack of him - Drew Bledsoe completing their lone TD drive on offense. Meanwhile the NE defense held the Steelers to 17 points and about 60 yards rushing (3 sacks, 3 INT, 0 FR). Troy Brown had a 55-yard punt return for a TD - and recovered a blocked Steelers' 34-yard FG attempt in a wild play that resulted in yet another Patriots' special teams TD. And again Vinatieri went 3/3 on FGs with a long of 40 yards. Final: 24-17 Patriots.


In Brady's second championship campaign (2003) he threw for 3620 yards, 29 TD, 19 INT - passer rating 85.9 (10th). Meanwhile, the Patriots' defense yielded a league-low 14.9 points per game: 41 sacks, 29 INTs, and 12 FR. They also held each of their AFCDG (Titans) and AFCCG (Colts) opponents to 14 points in winning 17-14 and 24-14 respectively. And they ultimately prevailed in a shootout with the Panthers in Superbowl XXXVIII, 32-29... Vinatieri with the game-winning FG from 41 yards. The Patriots defense had four sacks in the SB - compared to 0 for the Panthers.


In Brady's third championship season (2004) he threw for 3692 yards, 28 TD, 14 INT - passer rating 92.6 (9th).The Patriots defense allowed 16.3 PPG (T-2nd), 45 sacks (T-3rd), 20 INT (T-7th).

In the AFCDG round NE beat the Colts, 20-3. Brady was 18 of 27 for 144 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT, and sacked 3 times. He added another TD on a QB sneak. Peyton Manning was 27 of 42 for 238, 0 TD, 1 INT, and sacked once. The Patriots defense kept the Colts out of the endzone, collecting 1 INT and two fumbles, while the NE offense racked up 200 yards rushing with no turnovers. Vinatieri was 2 for 2 on FGs.

They then beat the Steelers in the AFCCG, 41-27. Brady was 14 of 21 for 207, 2 TD, 0 INT, sacked twice - Big Ben 14 of 24 for 226, 2 TD, 3 INT, sacked once. The NE defense created four turnovers, 1 fumble and three picks, which ultimately resulted in 24 NE points - 3 TDs and a FG (one INT being an 87-yard 'pick six' by Rodney Harrison). The Steelers defense created zero turnovers. Everything ELSE in that game was fairly even: First Downs: NE 18, PIT 19; Net Yardage: NE 322, PIT 388; TOP: NE 28:29, PIT 31:31, etc.

In Super Bowl XXIX NE prevailed over the Eagles 24-21. Brady went 23 of 33 for 236 yards with 2 TDs, 0 INT and sacked twice. His Eagle counterpart Donovan McNabb finished 30 of 51 for 357, 3 TDs, 3 INT and sacked four times. Both teams lost one fumble, neither of which resulted in a score. But Brady did have a drive-killing redzone fumble on 2nd-and-four from the PHI 4-yd line. And none of McNabbs three picks ultimately resulted in a Patriot score. But they did kill his teams' drives: one occurred on 1st-and-10 from the NE 19 yd line and another on 1st-and-10 from the NE 36. Outside of the 4-to-1 difference in turnovers everything else was pretty even: First Downs - NE 21, PHI 24; Net Yards - NE 331, PHI 369; Penalties - NE 7/47, PHI 3/35; TOP - NE 31:37, PHI 28:23. Which is why the lone FG attempt of the game proved to be the difference in the final score. Just a well-fought and pretty even matchup - one of the better Super Bowls I've seen.


Welp... I'll have to save New Orleans' and Green Bay's defensive contributions to their championships for another day.
 
ufcrules1;4356728 said:
Eli is the better QB and he will go down in history that way too unless some miracle happens in Dallas. Romo will be remembered for choking when it counted with some decent stats. Eli will be remembered for winning a super bowl.

Cruz made Eli look a lot better than he was.
 
ChldsPlay;4357309 said:
Cruz made Eli look a lot better than he was.

Not to mention our sorry DBs making him look better than he was as well.
 
Why are people so defensive about another qb being better than Romo..
Romo is good, even great sometimes, but he is not the best qb in the league..not even top 5

It's a fact, so why be so defensive or angered about it...

Are you gonna still be so angered or defensive if Romo moves to another team? are you still gonna argue he is better than Eli?

Eli is better..so what..good for him...we are COWBOYS fans not Romo fans

With the free agency era we live in..I don't care who is better who is worse as long as my Cowboys are WINNING

:cool:
 
mgcowboy;4357425 said:
Why are people so defensive about another qb being better than Romo..
Romo is good, even great sometimes, but he is not the best qb in the league..not even top 5

It's a fact, so why be so defensive or angered about it...

Are you gonna still be so angered or defensive if Romo moves to another team? are you still gonna argue he is better than Eli?

Eli is better..so what..good for him...we are COWBOYS fans not Romo fans

With the free agency era we live in..I don't care who is better who is worse as long as my Cowboys are WINNING

:cool:

Exactly.. but blind homer Romo fans will never agree with you. They think Romo is on the same level as Brees, Rogers, Peyton, and Brady. Just his team is bad and their teams are good. That is the only difference.
 
All right, I can't read this whole thing. Did the genius ever offer a viable solution as several people asked? Please tell me which page I would really like this answered from one genius that starts these threads. Thank you
 
ufcrules1;4357511 said:
Exactly.. but blind homer Romo fans will never agree with you. They think Romo is on the same level as Brees, Rogers, Peyton, and Brady. Just his team is bad and their teams are good. That is the only difference.
No. He is not on their level ok. Can you please arrange a trade so we can get one of them. Thanks!
 
ufcrules1;4357511 said:
Exactly.. but blind homer Romo fans will never agree with you. They think Romo is on the same level as Brees, Rogers, Peyton, and Brady. Just his team is bad and their teams are good. That is the only difference.

Not necessarily their teams, but definitely their offensive lines. I don't know how much football you guys actually watch, but Rodgers, Brady, and brees have a lot more time to throw.

Although I agree with the poster above regarding Ben rothlisbergers first super bowl, I have gained a lot of respect for him because he does it behind a bad offensive line.

If you put Eli on this team, we would be < 8-8
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,369
Messages
14,533,351
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top