RustyBourneHorse
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 40,722
- Reaction score
- 46,829
He was getting stoned at training camp and they knew that Tony Romo had excellent potential.
I get that. I'm just curious what would've happened if he wasn't doing that.
He was getting stoned at training camp and they knew that Tony Romo had excellent potential.
Answer: One of the most talented QBs of all time would've never played the game, disenfranchising a lot of fans of a lot of fantastic memories. That's because many "talent scouts" and many times "coaches" don't know talent if they tripped over it.
Did Carter get cut before preseason games?I predicted that they would keep Romo and cut Carter.
Is that verified that it was at camp? Wow...if so.He was getting stoned at training camp and they knew that Tony Romo had excellent potential.
Probably wins a Superbowl with Denver and goes in the HOFTony Romo would have been released. He was like QB #4 or #5 at that time.
Carter went to Southwwest Dekalb HS - located in southeastern metro Atlanta (Dekalb County). Back then they were a powerhouse football program under legendary coach William "Buck" Godfrey.Quincy is a nice guy that made bad choices. He moved down to my area several years ago...his girlfriend was from here. I interviewed him for a position, but he got into a little trouble again. He has since done well. He runs QB camps....I. believe he moved to San Antonio. Good guy, don't think he was the great QB that Jerry made him out to be.
He runs the Quincy Carter foundation. Look it up on Facebook. He's doing well.
Romo would have been signed elsewhere.
Cowboys still would have gone with Bledsoe.
Packers still get Rodgers.
Team would have sucked to watch awhile longer.
Quincy was not going to be our long-term qb.I was posting in a different thread, and I thought of a fun hypothetical thread. What would have happened if Quincy Carter had passed his drug test? (Granted, I wasn't even a teenager when this happened) Let's jump into the TARDIS and go back to 2003, where we begin our adventure to set the stage.
So, in 2003, Bill Parcells was taking over as the Cowboys head coach following 3 consecutive 5-11 seasons under Dave Campo. The draft of QBs that year consisted of the likes of Carson Palmer, Byron Leftwich, and Kyler Boller (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_NFL_Draft) being taken in round 1. The Cowboys would bring in an UDFA QB that year by the name of Tony Romo, but the FO and the staff at the time appeared to have felt that Quincy Carter was the best option available to start for the Cowboys that year. The Cowboys would go 10-6, make the playoffs, and lose to the Panthers in the playoffs. In 2004, Carter looked poised to start again, but they'd bring in Vinny Testaverde to be the backup (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinny_Testaverde). The Cowboys would trade the first round pick that year to Buffalo, which led to the Cowboys getting 2 first round picks a year later. Now, come to the point of this thread having set the stage.
So, Quincy Carter famously was cut on 4 August (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quincy_Carter), which resulted in Romo making the team. It turned out later that it was due to a failed drug test. However, suppose Quincy Carter doesn't fail the test? What would have happened? This is where the fun begins.
So, for the 2004 season, I think Quincy starts, Vinny is the backup, and Romo ends up on the PS. Let's suppose that the Cowboys go 6-10 like they did anyway that year.
So, on this hypothetical timeline, how differently do the Cowboys play the draft in 2005? I suspect we probably get DWare with our first of two first round picks. However, I can't help but wonder, would the Cowboys have drafted Aaron Rodgers with the second first round pick? I think it's telling that, with what actually happened, the Cowboys appeared to pass up on Rodgers in favour of Romo, who was apparently being developed to start. But, in this hypothetical situation, I do think the Cowboys might have taken Rodgers had Carter not failed his drug test.
I'd imagine, just as with Green Bay, Rodgers probably doesn't start in 2005, so, we end up with Bledsoe or Carter starting at first. Then, just as when Romo ended up starting against the Giants in 2006, I think the timeline would continue with Rodgers taking over that game. What I'm curious about is how would Rodgers have developed with us, and what would our fortunes have been like?
Don't get me wrong. I love what Romo did. I always appreciate what Romo did, and I think he was an amazing QB. That said, I think these hypocritical thoughts are always fun too. I can't help but wonder how things would have been different.
I believe he went to Dekalbs homecoming last night. He posted some pics on his personal fb page.Carter went to Southwwest Dekalb HS - located in southeastern metro Atlanta (Dekalb County). Back then they were a powerhouse football program under legendary coach William "Buck" Godfrey.
Carter and his Panthers won the 4A state championship in 1995.
He was honored as HS Player of the Year by both Parade All-American and USA Today.
Carter had signed a letter-of-intent with Georgia Tech in 1996, but went to play baseball when the Chicago Cubs selected him 52nd overall in the MLB draft.
After a couple of seasons in single A- ball, he decided to go back to football - but signed with Georgia Tech's arch rival Georgia.
That generated a lot of debate and desension in Atlanta and the state of Georgia.
The Yellow Jackets Athletics Department offcially contested Carter's move through the NCAA, but were overuled.
I take Romo over Rogers, personally.I was posting in a different thread, and I thought of a fun hypothetical thread. What would have happened if Quincy Carter had passed his drug test? (Granted, I wasn't even a teenager when this happened) Let's jump into the TARDIS and go back to 2003, where we begin our adventure to set the stage.
So, in 2003, Bill Parcells was taking over as the Cowboys head coach following 3 consecutive 5-11 seasons under Dave Campo. The draft of QBs that year consisted of the likes of Carson Palmer, Byron Leftwich, and Kyler Boller (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_NFL_Draft) being taken in round 1. The Cowboys would bring in an UDFA QB that year by the name of Tony Romo, but the FO and the staff at the time appeared to have felt that Quincy Carter was the best option available to start for the Cowboys that year. The Cowboys would go 10-6, make the playoffs, and lose to the Panthers in the playoffs. In 2004, Carter looked poised to start again, but they'd bring in Vinny Testaverde to be the backup (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinny_Testaverde). The Cowboys would trade the first round pick that year to Buffalo, which led to the Cowboys getting 2 first round picks a year later. Now, come to the point of this thread having set the stage.
So, Quincy Carter famously was cut on 4 August (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quincy_Carter), which resulted in Romo making the team. It turned out later that it was due to a failed drug test. However, suppose Quincy Carter doesn't fail the test? What would have happened? This is where the fun begins.
So, for the 2004 season, I think Quincy starts, Vinny is the backup, and Romo ends up on the PS. Let's suppose that the Cowboys go 6-10 like they did anyway that year.
So, on this hypothetical timeline, how differently do the Cowboys play the draft in 2005? I suspect we probably get DWare with our first of two first round picks. However, I can't help but wonder, would the Cowboys have drafted Aaron Rodgers with the second first round pick? I think it's telling that, with what actually happened, the Cowboys appeared to pass up on Rodgers in favour of Romo, who was apparently being developed to start. But, in this hypothetical situation, I do think the Cowboys might have taken Rodgers had Carter not failed his drug test.
I'd imagine, just as with Green Bay, Rodgers probably doesn't start in 2005, so, we end up with Bledsoe or Carter starting at first. Then, just as when Romo ended up starting against the Giants in 2006, I think the timeline would continue with Rodgers taking over that game. What I'm curious about is how would Rodgers have developed with us, and what would our fortunes have been like?
Don't get me wrong. I love what Romo did. I always appreciate what Romo did, and I think he was an amazing QB. That said, I think these hypocritical thoughts are always fun too. I can't help but wonder how things would have been different.
Jerry’s prideful arse should’ve been roasted for making us sit through 3 5-11 seasons under Campo and 3 8-8 under Boy Wonder. I still hate that he owns this team.Hahahahaha, and I'm not sure how my fandom would've held up as I started with Campo. So, I like timeline we are currently on, but, I can't help but wonder what would've happened if we had gotten Rodgers.
He wasn't getting stoned on the green. He was getting blasted on that thing plummers are notorious for. If it was just green, I think Parcells even may have exercised some patience. He wasn't a dinosaur. And I think Parcells cared enough about him to have given him a second chance.He was getting stoned at training camp and they knew that Tony Romo had excellent potential.
During the early to mid 90's I had a coworker whose two sons attended Southwest DeKalb with Carter - her eldest played on the baseball team with him.I believe he went to Dekalbs homecoming last night. He posted some pics on his personal fb page.
Does Romo get cut or buried on the depth chart and end up with Payton in NO in 2006?I was posting in a different thread, and I thought of a fun hypothetical thread. What would have happened if Quincy Carter had passed his drug test? (Granted, I wasn't even a teenager when this happened) Let's jump into the TARDIS and go back to 2003, where we begin our adventure to set the stage.
So, in 2003, Bill Parcells was taking over as the Cowboys head coach following 3 consecutive 5-11 seasons under Dave Campo. The draft of QBs that year consisted of the likes of Carson Palmer, Byron Leftwich, and Kyler Boller (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_NFL_Draft) being taken in round 1. The Cowboys would bring in an UDFA QB that year by the name of Tony Romo, but the FO and the staff at the time appeared to have felt that Quincy Carter was the best option available to start for the Cowboys that year. The Cowboys would go 10-6, make the playoffs, and lose to the Panthers in the playoffs. In 2004, Carter looked poised to start again, but they'd bring in Vinny Testaverde to be the backup (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinny_Testaverde). The Cowboys would trade the first round pick that year to Buffalo, which led to the Cowboys getting 2 first round picks a year later. Now, come to the point of this thread having set the stage.
So, Quincy Carter famously was cut on 4 August (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quincy_Carter), which resulted in Romo making the team. It turned out later that it was due to a failed drug test. However, suppose Quincy Carter doesn't fail the test? What would have happened? This is where the fun begins.
So, for the 2004 season, I think Quincy starts, Vinny is the backup, and Romo ends up on the PS. Let's suppose that the Cowboys go 6-10 like they did anyway that year.
So, on this hypothetical timeline, how differently do the Cowboys play the draft in 2005? I suspect we probably get DWare with our first of two first round picks. However, I can't help but wonder, would the Cowboys have drafted Aaron Rodgers with the second first round pick? I think it's telling that, with what actually happened, the Cowboys appeared to pass up on Rodgers in favour of Romo, who was apparently being developed to start. But, in this hypothetical situation, I do think the Cowboys might have taken Rodgers had Carter not failed his drug test.
I'd imagine, just as with Green Bay, Rodgers probably doesn't start in 2005, so, we end up with Bledsoe or Carter starting at first. Then, just as when Romo ended up starting against the Giants in 2006, I think the timeline would continue with Rodgers taking over that game. What I'm curious about is how would Rodgers have developed with us, and what would our fortunes have been like?
Don't get me wrong. I love what Romo did. I always appreciate what Romo did, and I think he was an amazing QB. That said, I think these hypocritical thoughts are always fun too. I can't help but wonder how things would have been different.