I hate how this team ignores fat players

Pessimist_cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,900
Reaction score
15,272
we need a big fat nasty 1 technique and this team continues to put in undersized DTs in the middle. It’s hurt us vs the run for years. We have some decent personnel on the DL lawrence , Irving, Collins are a good core but we need a Fat guy. He would plug things up command double teams and stop the run. Why has this team ignored this since Russell Maryland ?

Always going for undersized guys Glover, Ratliff, Paea why can’t we get a fat 320-330 pound guy in there?
 

BotchedLobotomy

Wide Right
Messages
15,509
Reaction score
23,603
we need a big fat nasty 1 technique and this team continues to put in undersized DTs in the middle. It’s hurt us vs the run for years. We have some decent personnel on the DL lawrence , Irving, Collins are a good core but we need a Fat guy. He would plug things up command double teams and stop the run. Why has this team ignored this since Russell Maryland ?

Always going for undersized guys Glover, Ratliff, Paea why can’t we get a fat 320-330 pound guy in there?
eyh-i-ain-t-fat-i-m-big-boned.png
 

Pessimist_cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,900
Reaction score
15,272
They don't fit the Cowboys scheme.

I'd email Jerry. Let him know your concern.
Lol I always hear that crap but why do other teams that run a 4-3 have bigger DT’s? I don’t think this team even knows what their “scheme” is.

Look at the giants with Harrison and the Vikings with Joseph. It helps out their DE’s so much. Even on the 2000 Bucs they had McFarland and Sapp .It’s the same scheme but this team doesn’t know how to make it work.
 

gmoney112

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,589
Reaction score
15,694
Jarron Jones isn't huge, but if they play him at DT (instead of OT which was random by NY), he'd be a decent fat guy.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,723
Reaction score
95,223
Jarron Jones isn't huge, but if they play him at DT (instead of OT which was random by NY), he'd be a decent fat guy.

LOL, but when you think about how bad the Giants OL is, in a bizarre way it makes sense.
 

Zordon

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,291
Reaction score
46,636
You forget how clever this Front Office is.

So, so clever.
I remember a Jerry interview after we switched to the 4-3 where he bragged about this scheme allowing us more player flexibility - essentially more players fit the 4-3 than the 3-4. 5 years later...I don't get that feeling.
 

TheHerd

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,543
Reaction score
15,007
we need a big fat nasty 1 technique and this team continues to put in undersized DTs in the middle. It’s hurt us vs the run for years. We have some decent personnel on the DL lawrence , Irving, Collins are a good core but we need a Fat guy. He would plug things up command double teams and stop the run. Why has this team ignored this since Russell Maryland ?

Always going for undersized guys Glover, Ratliff, Paea why can’t we get a fat 320-330 pound guy in there?

I've been saying this for a long time. but it always gets poo pooed as not a fit in today's NFL with all the zone running. I still want the fat immovable object in the middle. If he can move a little, even better.
 

Doc50

Original Fan
Messages
3,142
Reaction score
3,430
we need a big fat nasty 1 technique and this team continues to put in undersized DTs in the middle. It’s hurt us vs the run for years. We have some decent personnel on the DL lawrence , Irving, Collins are a good core but we need a Fat guy. He would plug things up command double teams and stop the run. Why has this team ignored this since Russell Maryland ?

Always going for undersized guys Glover, Ratliff, Paea why can’t we get a fat 320-330 pound guy in there?

Doesn't fit the Marinelli "rushmen" scheme.
At least our guys can run, so look on the bright side......oh, sorry, PC.

BTW, there are probably some Zoners who can fit your 1-tech qualifications.
 

Pessimist_cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,900
Reaction score
15,272
I've been saying this for a long time. but it always gets poo pooed as not a fit in today's NFL with all the zone running. I still want the fat immovable object in the middle. If he can move a little, even better.

I know this is what the Cowboys say but look at the 3 teams that run similar defenses:

Carolina = Lotulelei 320
Vikings=Joseph 329
Giants=Harrison 340

I just don’t think this team has any idea what they’re doing on defense.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
we need a big fat nasty 1 technique and this team continues to put in undersized DTs in the middle. It’s hurt us vs the run for years. We have some decent personnel on the DL lawrence , Irving, Collins are a good core but we need a Fat guy. He would plug things up command double teams and stop the run. Why has this team ignored this since Russell Maryland ?

Always going for undersized guys Glover, Ratliff, Paea why can’t we get a fat 320-330 pound guy in there?
We had the #1 run defense last year. I get that the offense helped, but c'mon..."need" might be a bit strong of a word to use. The way this defensive scheme is designed, it requires linebackers that can fill the gaps and run sideline to sideline. We sorely missed having Sean Lee out the last two games and right now Jaylon can run fast in a straight line, but struggles when required to change direction. That will come with time. The Cowboys are better than average with their front four right now. Of all the things you could complain about, the defensive line is no longer a viable option.
 
Top