I hate the Eagles

RoyTheHammer;3739250 said:
:rolleyes:

You can look it up as well and tell me what it says.

Hunting is a business.. that's why its legal. States make good business selling guns and ammo, so they in turn give a percentage of the taxes made from selling these weapons to wildlife agencies to keep populations high of animals that hunters go after in recreation, although they are allowed to spend these monies on any species if they have enough funds.. guess that makes it ok.

Look it up and tell me im wrong..

............

To anyone else in this thread.. if you'd like to continue this discussion, feel free to PM me. I think this thread has worn out its welcome.. about 3 days ago actually ha.. and it'd be in the best interest of the board to just move on i think. There are certainly more relevant topics to discuss with the Eagles game being just a couple days away, and i appriciate those who took the time to discuss this in a rational manner.

You are wrong.

That was easy.

BTW, dogfighting is a business too....doesn't make it legal. I'm thinking somewhere along the line, someone may have noticed a deference between the two "sports".
 
RoyTheHammer;3739245 said:
Its ok.. alot of people just laugh when they have nothing of value to say on a subject because they're ignorant to what really goes on.
I've said plenty.

Out of morbid curiosity again. Society has broken down. A loved one of yours is going to be killed. Please choose the method you want it accomplished.

a. drowning
b. electrocution
c. slammed to the ground over and over until dead
d. forced to fight another human being until dead
e. struck repeatedly with an object like a shovel
f. a bullet to the head or heart
 
Hostile;3739276 said:
I've said plenty.

Out of morbid curiosity again. Society has broken down. A loved one of yours is going to be killed. Please choose the method you want it accomplished.

a. drowning
b. electrocution
c. slammed to the ground over and over until dead
d. forced to fight another human being until dead
e. struck repeatedly with an object like a shovel
f. a bullet to the head or heart


Yes.. because all bullets are kill shots on animals being hunted. Please.

Animals that hunters prey on suffer.. Vicks pit bulls suffered. Unless one thinks that its perfectly ok for an animal to suffer up to an abitrary level, yet not ok at all to suffer past said arbitrary level.. then both are wrong imo because they both needlessly make innocent animals suffer for sport, or our personal self interest and enjoyment. The end.
 
tomson75;3739275 said:
You are wrong.

That was easy.

BTW, dogfighting is a business too....doesn't make it legal. I'm thinking somewhere along the line, someone may have noticed a deference between the two "sports".

Its your opinion that i am wrong about the information i provided and that is fine.

Its my opinion that you are ignorant to the subject and don't realize some of what goes on with hunting.

I can provide you with several links if you'd like to learn though. PM me. As i said before, this thread has more than worn out its welcome on this board imo.
 
MarionBarberThe4th;3739291 said:
Is football still on the site?

I apoligize.. its mostly my fault that the topic got geared less away from the OP and more towards an ethics debate. My bad.

:disseags: :suxiggle: :eagles: :trophy:
 
RoyTheHammer;3739305 said:
Its your opinion that i am wrong about the information i provided and that is fine.

Its my opinion that you are ignorant to the subject and don't realize some of what goes on with hunting.

I can provide you with several links if you'd like to learn though. PM me. As i said before, this thread has more than worn out its welcome on this board imo.

If you think that the government is putting money into wildlife development to sustain deer populations for hunting...then I won't need any validation to tell me I'm right. You're ignorance on the subject is clear enough for everyone to see.

As far as wearing out its welcome.....you seem to be the major antagonist predominant in every thread that mentions Vick...even those that had nothing to do with this subject until you participated in it. Funny how that works....

I'm done with it...nothing else needs to be said. You keep your opinion. I'll keep mine.
 
RoyTheHammer;3739311 said:
I apoligize.. its mostly my fault that the topic got geared less away from the OP and more towards an ethics debate. My bad.

:disseags: :suxiggle: :eagles: :trophy:


Bleh, maybe just merge all these.

Either that or admit dogs are simply a better creature then other animals.

Crap, you almost sucked me in.
 
RoyTheHammer;3739237 said:
Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act.

Look it up and tell me what it says.. I did my research bud, and plenty of it.


How come you have ignored the points about over population and the resulting SUFFERING of the wildlife that results? Seen it with my own eyes.

You do understand that all the natural predators that used to be the checks and balances no longer exist in most of the country, right?

Are you saying that if left unchecked wildlife populations would self regulate in a manner that causes less suffering than a well placed bullet?

Is that what you are saying?

I'm betting I get no reply from you to this question. It would be a good time to cut your losses and run. ;)

Ironically Eagles are protected from hunting! :laugh2:
 
MarionBarberThe4th;3739318 said:
Bleh, maybe just merge all these.

Either that or admit dogs are simply a better creature then other animals.

Crap, you almost sucked me in.

:laugh2:
 
Vtwin;3739321 said:
How come you have ignored the points about over population and the resulting SUFFERING of the wildlife that results? Seen it with my own eyes.

You do understand that all the natural predators that used to be the checks and balances no longer exist in most of the country, right?

Are you saying that if left unchecked wildlife populations would self regulate in a manner that causes less suffering than a well placed bullet?

Is that what you are saying?

I'm betting I get no reply from you to this question. It would be a good time to cut your losses and run. ;)

Ironically Eagles are protected from hunting! :laugh2:

Check your PM's.. and certain species of Eagles are not protected from hunting.. namely the deseanius jacksonious and the michaeleous vickasious.
 
RoyTheHammer;3739305 said:
Its your opinion that i am wrong about the information i provided and that is fine.

Its my opinion that you are ignorant to the subject and don't realize some of what goes on with hunting.

I can provide you with several links if you'd like to learn though. PM me. As i said before, this thread has more than worn out its welcome on this board imo.

I have worked with wildlife conservation on the local and state levels for 30 years and you are wrong about too many things to list. You have used the term " ignorant" in describing any poster that does not agree with views . The term should not be used unless you are sure who you are talking to. Some of these posters have made very valid posts. I hate the Eagles.
 
jnday;3739341 said:
I have worked with wildlife conservation on the local and state levels for 30 years and you are wrong about too many things to list. You have used the term " ignorant" in describing any poster that does not agree with views . The term should not be used unless you are sure who you are talking to. Some of these posters have made very valid posts. I hate the Eagles.

Then speak to me about the PR Act and why it exists.. from everything i read it filters portions of taxes from gun and ammunition sales back to wildlife agencies to "restore" populations of animals that are normally hunted in this country. I have links that support those statements i made. PM me if you'd like to discuss or have more information to share that i may be unaware of.
 
Thought Political discussions were banned on this board? Take it to Spintopia boys. :cool:
 
how about this, i am from there and i hate em! when an eagles fan finds out who i like and where i am from they look at me with great disdain to say the least....lol
 
STSINAZ;3739582 said:
how about this, i am from there and i hate em! when an eagles fan finds out who i like and where i am from they look at me with great disdain to say the least....lol

Yeah it happens every time the topic of "whos your favorite football team?" gets brought up.

Anyone who ever finds out that I'm a Cowboys fan almost has that look that if they were serving me food they would spit in it first.

Oh, also something that came up the other day. I hate that people are putting DeSean Jackson in the HOF already. I HATE that everyone thinks that Celek is their own brand of Witten. Please. Jackson is a little punk that only runs deep and catches bombs. He really doesn't do anything outside of that. IMO, Maclin will be a better receiver than Jackson in the long run. And as for Celek, I witnessed with my own eyes him dropping a crucial TD pass against the Bears last week, so I don't wanna hear about how he's on the same level as Witten.
 
187beatdown;3739640 said:
Yeah it happens every time the topic of "whos your favorite football team?" gets brought up.

Anyone who ever finds out that I'm a Cowboys fan almost has that look that if they were serving me food they would spit in it first.

Oh, also something that came up the other day. I hate that people are putting DeSean Jackson in the HOF already. I HATE that everyone thinks that Celek is their own brand of Witten. Please. Jackson is a little punk that only runs deep and catches bombs. He really doesn't do anything outside of that. IMO, Maclin will be a better receiver than Jackson in the long run. And as for Celek, I witnessed with my own eyes him dropping a crucial TD pass against the Bears last week, so I don't wanna hear about how he's on the same level as Witten.

Agreed. I just said the same thing in another thread but i already feel that Maclin is the better receiver. He just has a better game, an all around game, that Jackson will just never have. Guy is a punk, nothing more. Hasn't done much of anything at all in recent games he's played this season.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,007
Messages
14,506,138
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top