I have a theory

[peplaw06]

26

At first no, but after Key released, then who's left?? We're not trading for anyone, Moulds hasn't been released...... So Yes because we painted ourselves into a corner

 

[Concord]

I'm 22, and I thought it was hilarious. :laugh2:

I'm 39 and when I scrolled down and saw that I Busted up laughing...That was Funny no matter what age you are!

 

[Concord]

mschmidt has no sense.

his posts back it up.




Goodbye, Doogie.

You're on a roll...:laugh2:

 

[fanfromvirginia]

PLease post

1) your age

and

2) yes or no to T.O.


1) 27
2) NO FREAKIN WAY

Okay, I ran the numbers. I took out any wishy-washy/unclear data and calculated the averages. The Yes average was 34.3 while the No average was 34.5. So no discernible difference. If you want to cheat and pull out the Outlier Octagenarian Owens Optimist, then the Yes average drops down to 31.6.

 

[Zippy Speedster]

1> 30
2> Yes

I think this has very little to do with age or moral integrity- however that guy who brought up the republican or democrate thing, might just be on to something there. :laugh2: Lets face it, the whole "TO Issue" has gone beyond basic football 101 and treading real close to political. And unless you think he's worse then a ****, there's no way you can lump all TO supporters into one specific catagory--it just is not as decisive of a conclussion as many of you hope it will be.

 

[mschmidt64]

How about waiting to see the end product.

It would appear by this threads responses that there are younger people who don't want him and older people that do.

So why not say it is just wrong?

Isn't that what I did?

 

[fanfromvirginia]

1> 30
2> Yes

I think this has very little to do with age or moral integrity- however that guy who brought up the republican or democrate thing, might just be on to something there. :laugh2: Lets face it, the whole "TO Issue" has gone beyond basic football 101 and treading real close to political. And unless you think he's worse then a ****, there's no way you can lump all TO supporters into one specific catagory--it just is not as decisive of a conclussion as many of you hope it will be.

Anybody up for it? Democrat, no TO.

 

[cobra]

Isn't that what I did?

No. You made an *** out of yourself. And that conclusion is wholly different and apart from your preposterously juvenile legal posturing.

 

[SouthernStar]

57
No To

 

[Cbz40]

ODE OR THE COMMODE for TO


TO to be, or TO not to be, that is the question?

Whether he is to be, or not to be, we shall see.

If he is to be, many will shout with Glee!!

If he is to be many will shout, set us free!!!!

Whether he is or isn't to be I hope we find harmony.


As for me, I will simply wait and see, because whatever is to be will be.


My age= both Young & Old enough.

 

[SouthernStar]

His theory is that younger people will want TO because this generation is all about Style and substance, not morals and teamwork.

Style and substance are opposites.

 

[mschmidt64]

And that conclusion is wholly different and apart from your preposterously juvenile legal posturing.

Great, back to that.

I'm ready to go now.

Ok, so tell me how the federal government has power to regulate how a farmer uses his wheat, Mr. I practice law.

I'm gonna venture a guess that this isn't a knowledge issue but more of an "I'm a huge pro-government liberal" issue.

 

[SuspectCorner]

47, and yes (provided we can't swing a reasonable trade for javon walker). the addition of a top-shelf WR would go a ways toward loosening up defenses for our running game and TEs (witten).

 

[Cowboysguy]

36 and I'm a yes.

 

[SouthernStar]

As for me, I will simply wait and see, because whatever is to be will be.


My age= both Young & Old enough.

Que sera sera!

 

[superpunk]

Que sera sera!

Hey....that's MY new catch phrase for this week. Get your own.

 

[AsthmaField]

This may be a tad late, but...

Age: 39

TO?: Was strongly no... but after we cut Key and looking at our WR corps and who's available... I say yes to TO.

The only comfort is that you'd think that if Parcells didn't want him on the team or think that he couldn't handle him, he wouldn't get signed. So, assuming we sign him, Bill must think he can control Owens.

So, YES.

 

[lspain1]

51
Si to TO, Si to SB

 

[CowboyMike]

18

Yes! No! Yes! No! Yes! Ahhhhhh!!!!

 

[im2deep4u]

40

Yes, no, yes, no, yes no.....I will go with YES.