I still think Henson can be our QB of the future.

[Wolverine]

This was your same reaction when I kept sayin TO would be a Cowboy. Well look who was right. Me of course. And as usual you were wrong.

 

[The30YardSlant]

This was your same reaction when I kept sayin TO would be a Cowboy. Well look who was right. Me of course. And as usual you were wrong.

You're acting as if I approve of said acquisition. You think that you predicting something that half the people on this site and a good majority of the national media were predicting makes you some kind of guru? :laugh2:

The day Drew Henson becomes a good NFL quarterback will the day I vote for Hilary Clinton as the 43rd President of the United States.

 

[Wolverine]

You're acting as if I approve of said acquisition. You think that you predicting something that half the people on this site and a good majority of the national media were predicting makes you some kind of guru? :laugh2:

The day Drew Henson becomes a good NFL quarterback will the day I vote for Hilary Clinton as the 43rd President of the United States.

I was sayin TO would be a Cowboy long before the media thought it would go down. I remember the reasons I gave to. They were.

1. He would be able to get back at the Eagles 2 tiems a year.

2. He would get Eagle fans and the Eagle fans alot more p***ed as a Cowboy then with any other team.

3. His gettin back to play in the Super Bowl after a serious injury is the kinda thing Parcells would like.

4. We need a REAL #1 WR.



Those were some of the reason I gave.

I cant help I am right more then you are.

 

[Little Jr]

There's a way, but I can't understand it. It has something to do with some inane desire to have "called it" on an internet message board.

Dunno about you, but I'd much rather root for the Cowboys hopeful successful future than thump my chest and be right about something to a bunch of people I've never met.

But that's just me.

I dont understand how if someone thinks Henson cant get the job done it means they arent rooting for them. I've seen him play and just dont see anything that makes me feel like he will be a quality NFL QB.


If I or anyone else says I think Henson sucks. It doesnt mean Im not rooting for him. Just means I think he sucks. I felt the same way about Q but I rooted for him every Sunday. I've never seen anyone on this board that said they were rooting against Henson. I've just seen ones who arent impress with him. Myself included. Everytime someone talks down on Henson you and others always assume they are rooting against him. Just dont understand it.

 

[dallasfaniac]

I dont understand how if someone thinks Henson cant get the job done it means they arent rooting for them. I've seen him play and just dont see anything that makes me feel like he will be a quality NFL QB.


If I or anyone else says I think Henson sucks. It doesnt mean Im not rooting for him. Just means I think he sucks. I felt the same way about Q but I rooted for him every Sunday. I've never seen anyone on this board that said they were rooting against Henson. I've just seen ones who arent impress with him. Myself included. Everytime someone talks down on Henson you and others always assume they are rooting against him. Just dont understand it.

Often times the first people to point out how bad he does are the last to give him his credit. They will find any possible way to pick his game apart.

For instance, if he throws an INT then he shouldn't have thrown the pass, if he throws it away they point to his incompletions, if he takes a sack trying to find someone open and not throw the ball away, well then he doesn't have pocket presence. If he marches them down the field but the runningback gets the score they point to only throwing 1 TD in the game. If he hits a receiver for a TD then the guy was wide open but you won't find that in the NFL.

Point is, some will find any excuse to no matter how minute to show that he isn't a good NFL quarterback. That isn't evaluation, that is agenda. Those are the people everyone dislikes. Both sides have a few people with agendas, the rest of us just see it as game experience and look forward to seeing a QB battle in camp. Let it ride, per se.

 

[BigDFan5]

Often times the first people to point out how bad he does are the last to give him his credit. They will find any possible way to pick his game apart.

For instance, if he throws an INT then he shouldn't have thrown the pass, if he throws it away they point to his incompletions, if he takes a sack trying to find someone open and not throw the ball away, well then he doesn't have pocket presence. If he marches them down the field but the runningback gets the score they point to only throwing 1 TD in the game. If he hits a receiver for a TD then the guy was wide open but you won't find that in the NFL.

Point is, some will find any excuse to no matter how minute to show that he isn't a good NFL quarterback. That isn't evaluation, that is agenda. Those are the people everyone dislikes. Both sides have a few people with agendas, the rest of us just see it as game experience and look forward to seeing a QB battle in camp. Let it ride, per se.

BAM!

 

[Wolverine]

Often times the first people to point out how bad he does are the last to give him his credit. They will find any possible way to pick his game apart.

For instance, if he throws an INT then he shouldn't have thrown the pass, if he throws it away they point to his incompletions, if he takes a sack trying to find someone open and not throw the ball away, well then he doesn't have pocket presence. If he marches them down the field but the runningback gets the score they point to only throwing 1 TD in the game. If he hits a receiver for a TD then the guy was wide open but you won't find that in the NFL.

Point is, some will find any excuse to no matter how minute to show that he isn't a good NFL quarterback. That isn't evaluation, that is agenda. Those are the people everyone dislikes. Both sides have a few people with agendas, the rest of us just see it as game experience and look forward to seeing a QB battle in camp. Let it ride, per se.

Let the quitters quit on Henson. Like that one guy who quit on Henson after just 1/2 a game against the Bears.

Part of what has hurt Henson is how Parcells has done NOTHING to help him get better. There were times in the 04 and 05 season when we were done and outta the playoffs where Parcells coulda played Henson to get him some game time instead of let Vinny and bledsoe do some stat padding.


I really dont care how many responses I get with the laughin smilies at me but I will say it again...if Bledsoe should get hurt and is out 4 games he will not get his job back from Henson. I think that Henson is gonna be a real good one when given the chance here.

For those of you who have already quit on Henson please stay away from our wagon when he proves you wrong and proves us who believe in him RIGHT!

If I am wrong so what. I guess its kinda easy to believe in a 6'4" 235 lb QB who is very athletic strong and has a rocket for a arm and is extremely smart and havin one of the highest ever wonderlics.

 

[SultanOfSix]

Wolverine, you need to stop with all this nonsense that BP doesn't like Henson. Didn't you read the (old) article that was posted just a few days ago about the whole recruiting process for regarding Henson that BP was a significant factor in?

 

[Little Jr]

For instance, if he throws an INT then he shouldn't have thrown the pass, if he throws it away they point to his incompletions, if he takes a sack trying to find someone open and not throw the ball away, well then he doesn't have pocket presence. If he marches them down the field but the runningback gets the score they point to only throwing 1 TD in the game. If he hits a receiver for a TD then the guy was wide open but you won't find that in the NFL. .

That's with any young unproven QB. Youre going to have one side that sees everything wrong and one side that sees only or most of the good. You even get the same think with proven quality NFL QB's. Bledsoe comes to mind. Still doesnt mean they are rooting against them. They just see it different. I watch Q and saw nothing that showed me a quality NFL QB but some people did.

Point is, some will find any excuse to no matter how minute to show that he isn't a good NFL quarterback. That isn't evaluation, that is agenda. Those are the people everyone dislikes. Both sides have a few people with agendas, the rest of us just see it as game experience and look forward to seeing a QB battle in camp. Let it ride, per se.

Couldn't agree more. It just seems people are quick to call it agenda when you dont see it in Henson but it's called evaluation when you do see something in him. I just dont see it in Henson and it's not my agenda it's my evaluation.

 

[PacoReloaded]

I will say this. If Bledsoe should get injured this year and is out 4 or more games.....he will not get his job back. Henson will have taken it over.

Uhh.. you okay man? And since when did Henson because Brady?

 

[speedkilz88]

That's with any young unproven QB. Youre going to have one side that sees everything wrong and one side that sees only or most of the good. You even get the same think with proven quality NFL QB's. Bledsoe comes to mind. Still doesnt mean they are rooting against them. They just see it different. I watch Q and saw nothing that showed me a quality NFL QB but some people did.




Couldn't agree more. It just seems people are quick to call it agenda when you dont see it in Henson but it's called evaluation when you do see something in him. I just dont see it in Henson and it's not my agenda it's my evaluation.

A lot of those that don't see anything haven't even been watching him play and all they ever say is he sucks. Thats not adding anything to the discussion, thats just flaming.

 

[dallasfaniac]

That's with any young unproven QB. Youre going to have one side that sees everything wrong and one side that sees only or most of the good. You even get the same think with proven quality NFL QB's. Bledsoe comes to mind. Still doesnt mean they are rooting against them. They just see it different. I watch Q and saw nothing that showed me a quality NFL QB but some people did.

Couldn't agree more. It just seems people are quick to call it agenda when you dont see it in Henson but it's called evaluation when you do see something in him. I just dont see it in Henson and it's not my agenda it's my evaluation.

Realistically anyone that writes Henson off or assures a starting spot has an agenda. At this point in time Henson has potential. He has just as much potential to start in this league as he does to fizzle out. He could turn the corner and become an NFL starter, or get rattled too much in NFLE and become gunshy and go the way of Ryan Leaf.

Henson has all the tools, but can he put them together? I haven't seen enough of him to tell either way. If you think you can write him off after a few starts in college, a few snaps in the NFL and 3 games in NFLE, you are delusional and have an agenda, just like those that want to hand over the reins.

Henson just needs more game experience, which he is now getting, before any decision can be made. I am rooting for him to turn the corner, but that doesn't mean I think he can start at this time. We'll see as the NFLE season progresses and training camp arrives.

Aikman had a few bad games in his career and Ryan Leaf had a few good ones. Both looked promising. What was the difference? I like to think coaching and their mental makeup. It appears Henson is now getting the coaching and I thought all along he had the smarts. I have no need to make a prediction based upon a 50-50 chance just to prove myself on a board so I sit on the fence and wait to see how Henson handles things. From up here I can see both sides making fools of themselves like they know anything more about football than Parcells.