I think our defensive personnel fit the 4-3 better than the 3-4.

AtlCB

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,860
Reaction score
110
Looking at our defense, we have more talent on the DL than at LB. Ware is discounted, since he would be on the DL in a 4-3 and would be a LB in the 3-4. Ferguson would play NT in either scheme. Canty has shown that he is a better DT in the 4-3 than he is a DE in the 3-4. Our problem is at LDE and MLB. In the 3-4, we had prolems at LOLB and at both ILB positions. If Ellis is health, he is a better 4-3 DE than 3-4 OLB. I also believe Hatcher would excel at DE in the 4-3. Spears and Ratliff would be good backups at DT. Ratliff would probably be a decent backup at NT in the 4-3. We would have seven capable players at the four DL positions. I would hope Carpenter, Burnett, Ayodele, or James will be able to play MLB. If not, we will need to draft a couple. We would be stocked at OLB. Burnett and Carpenter would both excel at OLB in the 4-3. Both have good speed and tackle well.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Ellis is a better 4-3 DE than 3-4 OLB? By what measure? He was on pace to set a personal sack record at 3-4 OLB and that is with the added duties of coverage, etc.
 

baj1dallas

New Member
Messages
6,556
Reaction score
1
When saying Canty is a good DT because he did good there against Detroit, you're completely discounting the fact that Detroit had the worst interior line in the league, based on Gryphon's ratings..
 

stealth

Benched
Messages
4,882
Reaction score
0
baj1dallas;1363430 said:
When saying Canty is a good DT because he did good there against Detroit, you're completely discounting the fact that Detroit had the worst interior line in the league, based on Gryphon's ratings..

ya and boy oh boy did detroit play like crap that day too...oh wait
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,666
Reaction score
86,210
I think the 3-4 is a far superior defense to the 4-3 and I hope that we dont get away from it but its lookin like we are.
 

dallasfaniac

Active Member
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
1
baj1dallas;1363430 said:
When saying Canty is a good DT because he did good there against Detroit, you're completely discounting the fact that Detroit had the worst interior line in the league, based on Gryphon's ratings..

Gryphon's ratings asside, Detroit took so many sacks because of their offensive philosophy, not because of the personel per se. They were always looking for the deep ball as opposed to safer high percentage passes.
 

dallasfaniac

Active Member
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
1
I'm just tired of switching defenses. When we were toying with changing to the 3-4 most of us were saying we didn't have the personnel to run it, which was true at the time. We then went ahead and drafted/signed 3-4 talent and made the switch. Sure we have the personnel to run either, but I just wish we would settle on one and go with it. I don't care what formation we run, put players in positions that they will excell in, not just suffice.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
AtlCB;1363440 said:
Detroit game.

I think all he proved there was that he can play against Detroit. I hardly expect Ware to get 48 sacks in a 4-3 next year. (Exaggeration, but you understand.) That second DT position would be tough to fill. Ratliff might just be our best bet to do the interior pass rushing.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
AtlCB;1363409 said:
Looking at our defense, we have more talent on the DL than at LB. Ware is discounted, since he would be on the DL in a 4-3 and would be a LB in the 3-4. Ferguson would play NT in either scheme. Canty has shown that he is a better DT in the 4-3 than he is a DE in the 3-4. Our problem is at LDE and MLB. In the 3-4, we had prolems at LOLB and at both ILB positions. If Ellis is health, he is a better 4-3 DE than 3-4 OLB. I also believe Hatcher would excel at DE in the 4-3. Spears and Ratliff would be good backups at DT. Ratliff would probably be a decent backup at NT in the 4-3. We would have seven capable players at the four DL positions. I would hope Carpenter, Burnett, Ayodele, or James will be able to play MLB. If not, we will need to draft a couple. We would be stocked at OLB. Burnett and Carpenter would both excel at OLB in the 4-3. Both have good speed and tackle well.

You don't use a NT, or a zero technique, in a 43. You typically use a one gape alignment in a 43. This means that you don't have a DT lined up on the nose of the center. Typcially, you have a 1 technique who lines up in the A gape shoulder of the Center. You also have a 3 technique that is lined up on the shoulder of the Right Guard or B gape. This isn't always how it works but in a standard 43, it usually works this way. You can play a two technique which is heads up on the Guard or any combination of the above but that's usually how it works.

I do not believe that Canty can play DT in a 43. He may be able to but he's really tall and his pad level is bad for this. He doesn't play with the kind of leverage you'd like to see from a DT. I think he's a rotation DE, probably LDE. We will see I suppose.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Wasn't Canty going up against Peterman in the Detroit game? I'll have to go back and watch that.
 

TEK2000

New Member
Messages
2,152
Reaction score
0
In my mind, the Middle Linebacker position is the most important position in the 4-3.... and... that would be the biggest question mark for us if we go to the 4-3.

Do you really trust Bradie James to be able to play sideline to sideline or cover the entire middle of the field himself on passing plays?
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
I dont like this talk about going back to the 4-3 at all.

A couple questions for those ho do:

#1 You want to see one of, maybe the best 3-4 LBs (Ware) turn into a 1-dimensional player like that juice head in SD?

#2 Who is going to play MLB... Bradie James? I feel real comfortable with him
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,859
I think that Ware, Hatcher and Ellis (if healthy) are a great 4-3 DE tandem but Fergie is the only guy with experiecnce at taclkle and even if both Spears and Canty successfully transition to the 3 technique we still dont have depth.

Also saying we have better depth at DL over LBer is suspect as well.
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
AtlCB;1363409 said:
Looking at our defense, we have more talent on the DL than at LB. Ware is discounted, since he would be on the DL in a 4-3 and would be a LB in the 3-4. Ferguson would play NT in either scheme. Canty has shown that he is a better DT in the 4-3 than he is a DE in the 3-4. Our problem is at LDE and MLB. In the 3-4, we had prolems at LOLB and at both ILB positions. If Ellis is health, he is a better 4-3 DE than 3-4 OLB. I also believe Hatcher would excel at DE in the 4-3. Spears and Ratliff would be good backups at DT. Ratliff would probably be a decent backup at NT in the 4-3. We would have seven capable players at the four DL positions. I would hope Carpenter, Burnett, Ayodele, or James will be able to play MLB. If not, we will need to draft a couple. We would be stocked at OLB. Burnett and Carpenter would both excel at OLB in the 4-3. Both have good speed and tackle well.


Gregg ellis would disagree with you. He was on with mike doocy sunday night and said this team cant go to a 43 because it would need alot of change and would take more than a year...

so ellis thinks we cant...

time will tell
 

Carl23

Active Member
Messages
495
Reaction score
191
regardless of the Ellis debate, I've always felt that we had the talent to switch between a 3-4 and a 4-3. I do believe that Ferguson is too large to be effective in the 4-3...
 

AtlCB

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,860
Reaction score
110
ABQCOWBOY;1363458 said:
You don't use a NT, or a zero technique, in a 43. You typically use a one gape alignment in a 43. This means that you don't have a DT lined up on the nose of the center. Typcially, you have a 1 technique who lines up in the A gape shoulder of the Center. You also have a 3 technique that is lined up on the shoulder of the Right Guard or B gape. This isn't always how it works but in a standard 43, it usually works this way. You can play a two technique which is heads up on the Guard or any combination of the above but that's usually how it works.

I do not believe that Canty can play DT in a 43. He may be able to but he's really tall and his pad level is bad for this. He doesn't play with the kind of leverage you'd like to see from a DT. I think he's a rotation DE, probably LDE. We will see I suppose.
The scheme that we ran under Zimmer before the switch put the NT directly over the center. Tampa ran the same scheme when they went to the superbowl.
 
Top