I think that some fans here are taking Romos performance overboard

Randy Galloway is right...Trust in Big Bill Except for Quarterbacks.

I disagree, I don't think that BPis given enough credit for developing our young QBs they way they should be. In the past the young QBs always sat for 2-3 years and learned from a veteran, which is exactly what Romo and Henson are doing here. At the present, it looks like Romo is just about there. Will Henson get there? we shall see, but he is getting the same opportunity that Romo is.

I think you will see this year, Romo will benefit from the 3 years of being an understudy (if Bledsoe gets injured), same as Rivers will in SD.
 
I dont think anyone is hating on Romo. He played well but like others have mentioned the game plan with Romo was simple. Against a Real 1st Team, in a real regular season game we would of got beaten up BAD!.

Again I'll repeat myself. Romo played well and is showing good " Moxie". I'm happy as any Cowboy fan should be, but lets not compare him with Bledsoe.

Bledsoe isnt the mobile Qb but he can make every pass in the BOOK. When I see Romo doing everything Bledsoe can do or better I'll be ready to accept him as our next Qb of the future. For now He's a solid #2 and that's where it ends.
 
The Duke said:
Romo looked sharp, but let's see more since with the exception of one throw over the middle to Glenn, the rest wore dump offs, outs, and slants.

Quincy got good at throwing the bomb pass and alot of dumps and see where that got him. Coordinators had a feild day with QC knowing he couldn't make the medium range 15-20 yard throws. Square-ins, deep outs, quick post, seam route are what I want to see not 20 dumps.

You just don't throw away a possible HOF QB that's proven and go rashly with a dump off artist.

What the real shame of all of this scenario is that Parcells wouldn't put Romo in at the end of a losing season but goes with Testeverde. Then, he can't find ANY time for Romo to play last year.

Randy Galloway is right...Trust in Big Bill Except for Quarterbacks.

Exactly.
 
I wouldnt care if he dumped off passes all game if it gets the team in the endzone, but i'm beginning to hope Romo doesnt make it just so people could quit using the word Moxie
 
The Duke said:
Randy Galloway is right...Trust in Big Bill Except for Quarterbacks.

Oh sure. I love all you guys that prefer the Jerry Jones method of developing QBs.:rolleyes:
 
InmanRoshi said:
Tony's combined preseason numbers of last year and (so far) this year:

42 completions
62 attempts
68% Comp. Percent.
508 yards
12 YPC
2 TD
0 INT
103.4 QB Rating

Its been more than just one good performance.

Good QB's often times make it look it look easy. That's one of the things about Henson in Europe that left me unimpressed. Moving the offense never looks easy or effortles to him. Everything is erratic, labored and panicked.
Great Post. I have been trying to point out that he has had more than one good outing. He won the backup job last year outright and held it all year due to his solid play at the position. He has now taken the next step of getting some attention as a possible candidate for the starter role.

It is very unlikely that he will get the starter job this year unless Bledsoe goes down. But I'm expecting to see good things from him whenever he gets his chance. At the very least I am now comfortable with our backup situation and that is important with an aging vet in the saddle.
 
The Duke said:
Romo looked sharp, but let's see more since with the exception of one throw over the middle to Glenn, the rest wore dump offs, outs, and slants.

Quincy got good at throwing the bomb pass and alot of dumps and see where that got him. Coordinators had a feild day with QC knowing he couldn't make the medium range 15-20 yard throws. Square-ins, deep outs, quick post, seam route are what I want to see not 20 dumps.
What you fail to mention is that those dumpoffs that you speak so disparagingly of were the 2nd and 3rd reads in his progressions. Which means that he was not dwelling on any primary receiver and holding the ball too long as Bledsoe is notorious for doing. His receivers have to get open down the field before he can throw it to them there. BTW those throws to the sideline 10 to 15 yards down the field are not easy throws. It takes a good arm to get the ball there as quickly as he was getting it there.

I'm not sure why you even bring Quincy into the discussion. Quincy was a decent QB if he could stand in the pocket his biggest problem was that he would panic and throw into traffic EVERY time he was flushed. That and he also could not make the reads anywhere near as fast as Romo does or he would not have been flushed as often. Quincy is about as irrelevant as you can get in this discussion.

You just don't throw away a possible HOF QB that's proven and go rashly with a dump off artist.

What the real shame of all of this scenario is that Parcells wouldn't put Romo in at the end of a losing season but goes with Testeverde. Then, he can't find ANY time for Romo to play last year.

Randy Galloway is right...Trust in Big Bill Except for Quarterbacks.
For the record I am not advocating replacing Bledsoe with Romo just yet. Bledsoe played well last year and he is a good QB with one of the great arms ever. But Bledsoe does have his drawbacks in being immobile and holding the ball too long waiting on some particular receiver to clear. He needs to do more of the very thing you condemn Romo for doing...find that dumpoff guy and get some positive yards instead of taking the sack.

BTW You know you really lose credibility when you start quoting Randy Galloway on anything.
 
Wait till Romo gets TO to throw too. He will be that much better. Also Bill has a very vanilla offense in preseason games.
 
jackrussell said:
Oh sure. I love all you guys that prefer the Jerry Jones method of developing QBs.:rolleyes:

And refer to Randy Galloway as being "right". :eek:
 
Murph80 said:
Wait till Romo gets TO to throw too. He will be that much better. Also Bill has a very vanilla offense in preseason games.
Bill has a very vanilla offense in the regular season for that matter...but your point is well taken.
 
Murph80 said:
Wait till Romo gets TO to throw too. He will be that much better. Also Bill has a very vanilla offense in preseason games.

I don't know.

When I look deep into his eyes, they just look like scary black dots.
34915.jpg

I don't think he has a soul. That could be trouble down the road.
 
JackMagist said:
Bill has a very vanilla offense in the regular season for that matter...but your point is well taken.

Holmgren ran a very vanilla defense in that game, as well.
 
superpunk said:
I don't know.

When I look deep into his eyes, they just look like scary black dots.
34915.jpg

I don't think he has a soul. That could be trouble down the road.
I just hope they scare the opposing defenses. Maybe he can learn to make his head spin around 360 degrees for better effect.
 
JackMagist said:
I just hope they scare the opposing defenses. Maybe he can learn to make his head spin around 360 degrees for better effect.
A QB that can induce projectile vomiting is a dangerous weapon.
 
JackMagist said:
What you fail to mention is that those dumpoffs that you speak so disparagingly of were the 2nd and 3rd reads in his progressions. Which means that he was not dwelling on any primary receiver and holding the ball too long as Bledsoe is notorious for doing. His receivers have to get open down the field before he can throw it to them there. BTW those throws to the sideline 10 to 15 yards down the field are not easy throws. It takes a good arm to get the ball there as quickly as he was getting it there.

I'm not sure why you even bring Quincy into the discussion. Quincy was a decent QB if he could stand in the pocket his biggest problem was that he would panic and throw into traffic EVERY time he was flushed. That and he also could not make the reads anywhere near as fast as Romo does or he would not have been flushed as often. Quincy is about as irrelevant as you can get in this discussion.

For the record I am not advocating replacing Bledsoe with Romo just yet. Bledsoe played well last year and he is a good QB with one of the great arms ever. But Bledsoe does have his drawbacks in being immobile and holding the ball too long waiting on some particular receiver to clear. He needs to do more of the very thing you condemn Romo for doing...find that dumpoff guy and get some positive yards instead of taking the sack.

BTW You know you really lose credibility when you start quoting Randy Galloway on anything.



OUCH!

I think Jack "schooled" someone!
 
Romo did a very good job but Bledsoe is still the starter I have no doubts about that.
 
JackMagist said:
What you fail to mention is that those dumpoffs that you speak so disparagingly of were the 2nd and 3rd reads in his progressions. Which means that he was not dwelling on any primary receiver and holding the ball too long as Bledsoe is notorious for doing. His receivers have to get open down the field before he can throw it to them there. BTW those throws to the sideline 10 to 15 yards down the field are not easy throws. It takes a good arm to get the ball there as quickly as he was getting it there.

I'm not sure why you even bring Quincy into the discussion. Quincy was a decent QB if he could stand in the pocket his biggest problem was that he would panic and throw into traffic EVERY time he was flushed. That and he also could not make the reads anywhere near as fast as Romo does or he would not have been flushed as often. Quincy is about as irrelevant as you can get in this discussion.

For the record I am not advocating replacing Bledsoe with Romo just yet. Bledsoe played well last year and he is a good QB with one of the great arms ever. But Bledsoe does have his drawbacks in being immobile and holding the ball too long waiting on some particular receiver to clear. He needs to do more of the very thing you condemn Romo for doing...find that dumpoff guy and get some positive yards instead of taking the sack.

BTW You know you really lose credibility when you start quoting Randy Galloway on anything.

:hammer:
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackMagist
What you fail to mention is that those dumpoffs that you speak so disparagingly of were the 2nd and 3rd reads in his progressions. Which means that he was not dwelling on any primary receiver and holding the ball too long as Bledsoe is notorious for doing. His receivers have to get open down the field before he can throw it to them there. BTW those throws to the sideline 10 to 15 yards down the field are not easy throws. It takes a good arm to get the ball there as quickly as he was getting it there.

I'm not sure why you even bring Quincy into the discussion. Quincy was a decent QB if he could stand in the pocket his biggest problem was that he would panic and throw into traffic EVERY time he was flushed. That and he also could not make the reads anywhere near as fast as Romo does or he would not have been flushed as often. Quincy is about as irrelevant as you can get in this discussion.

For the record I am not advocating replacing Bledsoe with Romo just yet. Bledsoe played well last year and he is a good QB with one of the great arms ever. But Bledsoe does have his drawbacks in being immobile and holding the ball too long waiting on some particular receiver to clear. He needs to do more of the very thing you condemn Romo for doing...find that dumpoff guy and get some positive yards instead of taking the sack.

BTW You know you really lose credibility when you start quoting Randy Galloway on anything.


Dumpoffs are good and bad, it depends. For Bledsoe, I would agree he needs more of it. He holds on too long for the medium and long throws. But for QC (and yes any QB can be used as a comparison in a discussion and can be relevent) who could not read defenses and dump balls off fast because he "read" reciever 1, 2, and 3 so fast that he didn't give the play a chance nor "read" at all. (BP only had QC read half the field). Romo is using the full playbook and reading the whole field. He is probably reading his progressions which lead to the dump offs, but we don't know that for sure. Only the coach does. He maybe reading them too quick and not giving the play a chance. I hope not, but until a young QB proves himself making all the throws in a real NFL game then the too many dumps are classic rookie running to the safe bet too fast many times.

And I compliment Romo on those back shoulder streaks 15 yard throws. But those throws were about his throwing ability (which is not questioned as good enough). He made no read to decide to throw there. For a rookie, throw lots of go routes, dumps, slants, and outs...little if any reading.

And I don't care what idiot said it..."Trust in Big Bill Except QBs" has proven true so far.

The rest of the team is poised for the Superbowl. But the QBs are questionable. Let Jake Delhomme go, ruined Henson's confidence and throwing motion, hasn't got Romo any trash playing time for 3 years, not drafted a QB, etc...
 
The Duke said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackMagist
What you fail to mention is that those dumpoffs that you speak so disparagingly of were the 2nd and 3rd reads in his progressions. Which means that he was not dwelling on any primary receiver and holding the ball too long as Bledsoe is notorious for doing. His receivers have to get open down the field before he can throw it to them there. BTW those throws to the sideline 10 to 15 yards down the field are not easy throws. It takes a good arm to get the ball there as quickly as he was getting it there.

I'm not sure why you even bring Quincy into the discussion. Quincy was a decent QB if he could stand in the pocket his biggest problem was that he would panic and throw into traffic EVERY time he was flushed. That and he also could not make the reads anywhere near as fast as Romo does or he would not have been flushed as often. Quincy is about as irrelevant as you can get in this discussion.

For the record I am not advocating replacing Bledsoe with Romo just yet. Bledsoe played well last year and he is a good QB with one of the great arms ever. But Bledsoe does have his drawbacks in being immobile and holding the ball too long waiting on some particular receiver to clear. He needs to do more of the very thing you condemn Romo for doing...find that dumpoff guy and get some positive yards instead of taking the sack.

BTW You know you really lose credibility when you start quoting Randy Galloway on anything.

Dumpoffs are good and bad, it depends. For Bledsoe, I would agree he needs more of it. He holds on too long for the medium and long throws. But for QC (and yes any QB can be used as a comparison in a discussion and can be relevent) who could not read defenses and dump balls off fast because he "read" reciever 1, 2, and 3 so fast that he didn't give the play a chance nor "read" at all. (BP only had QC read half the field). Romo is using the full playbook and reading the whole field. He is probably reading his progressions which lead to the dump offs, but we don't know that for sure. Only the coach does. He maybe reading them too quick and not giving the play a chance. I hope not, but until a young QB proves himself making all the throws in a real NFL game then the too many dumps are classic rookie running to the safe bet too fast many times.

And I compliment Romo on those back shoulder streaks 15 yard throws. But those throws were about his throwing ability (which is not questioned as good enough). He made no read to decide to throw there. For a rookie, throw lots of go routes, dumps, slants, and outs...little if any reading.

And I don't care what idiot said it..."Trust in Big Bill Except QBs" has proven true so far.

The rest of the team is poised for the Superbowl. But the QBs are questionable. Let Jake Delhomme go, ruined Henson's confidence and throwing motion, hasn't got Romo any trash playing time for 3 years, not drafted a QB, etc...

Your rebuttal was admirable, but I still agree w/t JackMagist.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,051
Messages
13,846,003
Members
23,786
Latest member
waycooljr
Back
Top