dbair1967
Arch Defender
- Messages
- 30,782
- Reaction score
- 1
ConcordCowboy;1314866 said:OMG.
This is like one of those Urban Legends that just won't die.
Aikman was asked to work out both.
He liked both. He liked Gonzalez better...But said LaFleur was fine...Not exact words...But you get the point.
The Cowboys would have taken Gonzalez if the opportunity was there...BUT it wasn't because the Chiefs had already taken Gonzalez.
The Cowboys took the Next best TE...LaFleur.
Aikman didn't tell the Cowboys to take LaFleur or that he was better than Gonzalez.
I just cant believe where some people come up with the garbage of "Aikman had Jones draft this guy or sign that guy"
that isnt what happened...its likethe people saying a move works because of Parcells, but if it sux its because of Jones pulling the strings...
we needed a TE badly in 1997...there were two consensus first rounders..one of the scouting organizations (I believe Blesto) had LaFleur rated the 9th best player in the draft...the guy wasnt some 2nd day scrub prospect who we drafted in the 1st rd...
and we badly needed a premier WR in 2000...it was painfully obvious our WR's were garbage from the mid 90's onward (save Irevin, who was obviously out of the picture after early in the 99 season)...Galloway was one of the premier game breaking, explosive WR's in the league...we went and got him...he got hurt, then Aikman called it quits after that 2000 season...unfortunately it didnt work out
David