If T.O Goes Does Jerry Go After Housh?

Oh_Canada

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,083
Reaction score
4,222
...or do they let Austin, Stanback and Crayton battle for the #2 spot?
 

ajk23az

Through Pain Comes Clarity
Messages
7,953
Reaction score
422
Stanback shouldn't even be mentioned in the "battling for #2" sentence.

And oh yeah, TO isn't leaving.
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
This is a bad idea.

If Terrell Owens were cut today, I believe you do absolutely nothing to the Receiving Core.

The Wide Receivers would be perfect because you would have your Playmaker in Roy Williams (assuming this year was an anamoly) and your grunts like Patrick Crayton and Miles Austin.

Also, that is not even mentioning Martellus Bennett and Jason Witten.

It would be a huge mistake to acquire more receivers.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,231
Good Lord no!!!!

The last thing we need is to start signing Bengals.

We might as well just keep TO in that case.
 

THUMPER

Papa
Messages
9,522
Reaction score
61
Bach;2577519 said:
Knowing Jerry, he'd go after Chad Johnson.

:bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: Because you are right!

I'd love to have TJ here but I don't think we would have the cap room, especially if we let Owens walk but that's OK.

Cut Terrell and see what we have in our guys. See who we can pickup in FA and the draft.

I'd like to see us focus on the running game next season anyway so we don't need two big name WRs.
 

xWraithx

Benched
Messages
3,449
Reaction score
1
only if there is a stipulation in his contract that makes it mandatory that he remove that idiotic pony tail
 

Real1st

Nikola Tesla
Messages
6,060
Reaction score
1,599
Maikeru-sama;2577523 said:
This is a bad idea.

If Terrell Owens were cut today, I believe you do absolutely nothing to the Receiving Core.

The Wide Receivers would be perfect because you would have your Playmaker in Roy Williams (assuming this year was an anamoly) and your grunts like Patrick Crayton and Miles Austin.

Also, that is not even mentioning Martellus Bennett and Jason Witten.

It would be a huge mistake to acquire more receivers.

I think we will be a more run oriented team next year. If we cut T.O.
 

Zimmy Lives

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,165
Reaction score
4,631
Maikeru-sama;2577523 said:
This is a bad idea.

If Terrell Owens were cut today, I believe you do absolutely nothing to the Receiving Core.

The Wide Receivers would be perfect because you would have your Playmaker in Roy Williams (assuming this year was an anamoly) and your grunts like Patrick Crayton and Miles Austin.

Also, that is not even mentioning Martellus Bennett and Jason Witten.

It would be a huge mistake to acquire more receivers.

Agreed. Let's also add Felix Jones to that mix.
 

Randy White

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,167
Reaction score
80
is released, the Cowboys will have very little money to bring in a player like whosyourmama.. and they won't need to anyways.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,231
Real1st;2577538 said:
I think we will be a more run oriented team next year. If we cut T.O.

Run oriented???

With Tecmo coming back???

I doubt it...........Tecmo only likes to run out of shotgun.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
If T.O. goes (which he's not) then I don't think you'd see them spend much on another WR. They'd probably just put Crayton back at #2 and Austin at #3 and draft someone or get an older vet FA to come in and play #2. I don't think we'll see this team splurge again for a while, at least not if they are serious about changing the attitude around here instead of just signing whoever they want like the Commanders.
 

Mansta54

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,945
Reaction score
482
Maikeru-sama;2577523 said:
This is a bad idea.

If Terrell Owens were cut today, I believe you do absolutely nothing to the Receiving Core.

The Wide Receivers would be perfect because you would have your Playmaker in Roy Williams (assuming this year was an anamoly) and your grunts like Patrick Crayton and Miles Austin.

Also, that is not even mentioning Martellus Bennett and Jason Witten.

It would be a huge mistake to acquire more receivers.

I agree but I think Austin is more then a grunt. He has size, speed, and big play ability. He's our no. 2 for sure, he needs to stay healthy tho. The kid has game...
 

Oh_Canada

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,083
Reaction score
4,222
The only reason I ask is because Housh is a solid route runner, tough, good character and very reliable. They could do worse than signing him, but definately would understand the case for bringing in no one. Austin should blossom next year.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
Mansta54;2577550 said:
I agree but I think Austin is more then a grunt. He has size, speed, and big play ability. He's our no. 2 for sure, he needs to stay healthy tho. The kid has game...

Miles made huge strides, but he also had all of 13 catches this year. Which I guess is better than the 5 he made last year. I like where he's headed, but I'm not ready to bank the world on a guy that has 18 catches in 3 years.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,231
TheCount;2577548 said:
If T.O. goes (which he's not) then I don't think you'd see them spend much on another WR. They'd probably just put Crayton back at #2 and Austin at #3 and draft someone or get an older vet FA to come in and play #2. I don't think we'll see this team splurge again for a while, at least not if they are serious about changing the attitude around here instead of just signing whoever they want like the Commanders.

Didnt Crayton totally blow as a #2 receiver???

Wasnt that the reason to trade for Roy11, because Crayton totally sucked at being the #2 guy opposite TO???

So how does Crayton now become the new #2 opposite Roy11 when he totally sucked as the #2 across from TO???

Dont tell me we traded a 1,3,6 for nothing:mad:
 

pittman11

New Member
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Good morning I don't think crayton is that good of a receiver if we are going to get rid of someone I think it should be him and stanback. First of all crayton missed two key catches last year in the playoff game and stanback can't stay healthy enough to play a season. I say put RW11 on one side and Austin on the other side then move TO sow he can run the slant routes where he is more prone to catch the ball and pick up major yards
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
Beast_from_East;2577562 said:
Didnt Crayton totally blow as a #2 receiver???

Wasnt that the reason to trade for Roy11, because Crayton totally sucked at being the #2 guy opposite TO???

So how does Crayton now become the new #2 opposite Roy11 when he totally sucked as the #2 across from TO???

Dont tell me we traded a 1,3,6 for nothing:mad:

I don't know if I'd say he sucked, he was just average.

Romo has yet to get a 3rd receiver behind T.O. and Witten really involved, either by his own judgment or by the scheme, so it's tough to say what would happen.

I don't think Romo has great field vision as it is, he rarely gets beyond his 2nd read, often because he has no time to.
 

Oh_Canada

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,083
Reaction score
4,222
TheCount;2577559 said:
Miles made huge strides, but he also had all of 13 catches this year. Which I guess is better than the 5 he made last year. I like where he's headed, but I'm not ready to bank the world on a guy that has 18 catches in 3 years.

Good point and if T.O does go and the Boys do nothing to address the position further we will know they must think highly of him...if not than we should assume they aren't sure themselves.
 
Top