If The Rams offered the Cowboys ......

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,343
Reaction score
20,704
If the Rams offered Todd Gurley and their pick at #15 to move up to #4 overall would you do it, and why?
 
Wasn't he considered a better prospect than Elliot is? I've heard Elliot is a more complete back but Gurley was more explosive, or something like that. If people are willing to take Elliot with our 4th, I'd definitely take a similar player and still get to pick 15th in the draft... Not sure why the Rams would offer that though.
 
I'd take a young Rookie of the Year winner at several other positions, too, to move back 11 places. In case anybody's interested.
 
If the Rams offered Todd Gurley and their pick at #15 to move up to #4 overall would you do it, and why?

That's a no brainer. The harder question is would I do #4 for Gurley straight up? I might still do that.
 
While I'd be ecstatic about the Cowboys getting Gurley, it's simply wishful thinking that the Rams would even consider letting him go. He's the ace of their offense and he'd be likewise for ours.
 
Last edited:
Of course. For obvious reasons. the better question is why would the Rams do this? They wouldn't unless they had knowledge of something concerning Gurley making him expendable, thus making it a mistake for the team trading for him.
 
The rams want to form their own triplets (you would think)...thus, trading the RB to presumably get the QB would not make sense...and then throwing the #15 on top? they would be doh-dohs to do this...they have a spiffy DL guy as well that we all kinda like...why not throw him in as well?
 
Yes. In a heartbeat.

Cant believe folks would say no to this. You get a young stud at Running Back and only have to move down 11 spots. We could still grab a Shaq Lawson, Noah Spence, or Sheldon Rankins type.

So you get:
RB Todd Gurley
DE Shaq Lawson

instead of what? Bosa? Deforest Buckner?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
466,179
Messages
13,921,240
Members
23,795
Latest member
Derekbsenior
Back
Top