Deep_Freeze
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,225
- Reaction score
- 3,442
BTW, Romo was paid off to drop the ball. He's now in Vegas spending his winnings.
mambo;1313538 said:so it's only fixed (possibly) when the Cowboys lose, but when the Cowboys win, it's because of dominance? Once again, I'll ask, when did the NFL start rigging games (possibly)? Was it before the Cowboys Super Bowls or after? And if it was after, please explain to me why it is impossible without something being fishy that a team that hasn't won in 40 years can start winning (see Steelers, Pittsburgh). And if it could be possible that the NFL fixes games, what does that say about the Cowboys, who, last I checked, played in the NFL?
He certainly does, he must also thank the weakest conference in the history of the modern game.Deep_Freeze;1313755 said:The Saints are playing good as a team, but talentwise, there are better teams in this league that aren't in the playoffs presently. Sean Payton deserves alot of credit for that team's success.
shrike3000;1314019 said:If any of you beleive even a little bit that the NFL is rigged then you are a fool to keep watching. If it is rigged there is no point in cheering on your team or watching the games. If it is rigged then what are you doing even being a fan at all?
This is ********.
Rack;1313777 said:What the hell do the cowboys have to do with it? You're the one that brought the cowboys into the discussion, not me.
Not to mention you specifically pointed out the 90s cowboys, then talk about how I supposedly feel a game is fixed (which I never said I believed) if the cowboys lose, not when they win.
Do you even have a freakin' clue what you're talking about?
My god, my 4 year old nephew makes more sense then you.
mambo;1314173 said:why won't you answer my question? If the NFL fixes games, when did they start? I have a clue as to why you wont answer my simple question, I bet if I ask your 4 year old nephew, he would understand, why can't you? Answer the question.
mambo;1313739 said:Great post, but I'll ask you this: if the Texans agreed to pass on Bush to help the Saints, why would they also pass on Young, Hawk, or Fergerson? Taking any one of those would have still allowed the Saints to take Bush.
Erik_H;1314372 said:Well, They had just given Carr 8 mil so Young's out. M Williams was porjected higher than Hawk and Ferguson...
umm, yeah ya got me there.
Most likely it just that the Texans and Casserly are idiots, but a little random conspiracy theory can be fun from time to time.
Rack;1314259 said:First of all, before you go on some moronic rampage (too late), when did I say the NFL fixes games?
Go ahead, search the thread... let me know when you find a quote with me saying the NFL fixes games.
Have fun, Chico.
mambo;1314391 said:you didn't say it, you insinuated it by comparing the situation to the corruption in boxing. Look, I'm not going to argue with you anymore, chico. You have exposed your feelings enough to know where you stand on this.