Q_the_man
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,931
- Reaction score
- 578
We cut Aikman then he retiredAikman retired. We did not cut him.
We cut Aikman then he retiredAikman retired. We did not cut him.
Way too late!!!We also cut Weedan and Cassel.
Actually, at the right time, that whole debacle landed us Zeke. Depends how you look at it hahaWay too late!!!
That was speculation, though. I know that Philly actually reached out to Aikman. I don't know if Turner and the Chargers ever did.
Why cut him? I know I am in the minority but I let his contract run out. Not paying anything for Dak now anyways and no need to do so till 3 years from now.
Wrong. Aikman was cut. He later decided to retire.Aikman retired. We did not cut him.
When did this happen? Because that isn't what I remember at all.If we can cut....Emmitt
There have been plenty of posts that have suggested either he wouldn't be cut because he has trade high value (which is obviously debatable) or that the team would never release him because he's either loved or respected too much. The latter being especially ridiculous as releasing him would be most beneficial to Tony.Not sure anyone has said Romo couldn't be cut.. All scenarios I've read is just related to timing, cap hits, etc.
Is the OP upset that people still actually LIKE Romo or something? lol
Not sure anyone has said Romo couldn't be cut.. All scenarios I've read is just related to timing, cap hits, etc.
Is the OP upset that people still actually LIKE Romo or something? lol
Why cut him? I know I am in the minority but I let his contract run out. Not paying anything for Dak now anyways and no need to do so till 3 years from now.
I'm just saying some people show more respect to Romo than both Aikman and Emmitt. Aikman and Emmitt won 3 rings. I don't understand Jerry, he has no issues cutting 2 of the greatest players in Cowboys history but acts as if Romo won 2 or 3 rings himself.
Don't mind me it's just an early morning rant.
The tone of the OP is suggesting that folks are saying, Romo can't be cut, which isn't true. He can be cut or traded, but that's not what the OP is saying. Unless I may have missed where he qualified it with a trade scenario.There have been plenty of posts that have suggested either he wouldn't be cut because he has trade high value (which is obviously debatable) or that the team would never release him because he's either loved or respected too much. The latter being especially ridiculous as releasing him would be most beneficial to Tony.
I remember Philly. Don't remember San Diego. However, obviously, my memory is fuzzy regarding that period.
Ah, fair enough.The tone of the OP is suggesting that folks are saying, Romo can't be cut, which isn't true. He can be cut or traded, but that's not what the OP is saying. Unless I may have missed where he qualified it with a trade scenario.
I stand corrected.
Aikman also said concussions had nothing to do with him retiring but I disagree. Almost every time he got hit he suffered a concussion.