If we can force two punts a game we'll win

[jazzcat22]

I think we can have the 2nd best offense behind the steelers.

Steelers do have a pretty good trio themselves at QB / RB / WR with some depth at RB & WR.

 

[Cowboys22]

No I do not watch it, I only post on here like I watch it.
I have not watched a game in my life. I recall back in 1966 as to not watching a game and said to myself...one of these days, I will post on something not yet invented yet called the CowboysZone about football, that I never watched.

What kind of a stupid question is that? I asked a question, but apparently you are the one that don't watch football since this was your reply.
You didn't even read what I posted most likely...you can read can't you?

You said if Dallas forces 3 punts/turnovers a half, they would be 19-0. That's ridiculous. That equats to stopping the other team roughly 50% of the time. If a team can't do that they cannot win. Actually, getting three stops a half only gets you to average territory which means the offense still has to be near the top to be a true contender.

 

[LocimusPrime]

Yeah, Gronk should be our target next off season.

And did you say Martellus Bennett to replace Witten?

Did i say marty b to repace witten? Nope. I said hes better than witten right now. Did i say we target gronk- cause hes not going anywhere- nope i said hes better than witten. Smh w the picard bald face emoticon holding his head x 10000000000000 lol lol lol. Please read before you put words in my mouth

 

[LocimusPrime]

Come on man.

Nah. Deandre, julio, and antonio brown are definately better. That automatically puts him 4th. Then if you asked all the gms who they would rather have to build a team w they would go with the younger guys like ODB (there are others too). Dez is gonna be 28, so hes got like 2-3 years left playing at an Elite level.

So i respect your opinion if you think hes the best receiver in the league or top 3 or whatever, but i have to disagree.

 

[fortdick]

Did i say marty b to repace witten? Nope. I said hes better than witten right now. Did i say we target gronk- cause hes not going anywhere- nope i said hes better than witten. Smh w the picard bald face emoticon holding his head x 10000000000000 lol lol lol. Please read before you put words in my mouth

• Witten has lost many steps, we need to replace him ASAP. But I'd take any of these guys to replace him: Greg Olson, Gronk, Marty B, Jordan Reed, Ertz, Travis Kelce, and Delaney Walker - I'm ok Owen Daniels too

Seems pretty clear to me what you said. Maybe you just don't pay attention to what you type.

 

[Toruk_Makto]

The 2014 squad averaged 29 points a game, all time best. So you are saying this offense is going to score above that?

If we scored 29 points in 2014 and he thinks we will score in the 30 then it seems quite clear to me that he believes this offense will score above that.

30 > 29

 

[CATCH17]

Steelers do have a pretty good trio themselves at QB / RB / WR with some depth at RB & WR.

And they have coaches that make them even harder to defend.

 

[LocimusPrime]

Seems pretty clear to me what you said. Maybe you just don't pay attention to what you type.

Yes. I said i would take any of those guys to replace him meaning i think all of those giys are better than him. Its like saying i'd take aaron rodgers over romo. Doesnt mean that we should target or would get aaron rogers but that i personally " would take him" over romo

 

[fortdick]

Yes. I said i would take any of those guys to replace him meaning i think all of those giys are better than him. Its like saying i'd take aaron rodgers over romo. Doesnt mean that we should target or would get aaron rogers but that i personally " would take him" over romo

Sorry, I based my response on what you said, not what you meant. Sometimes it gets confusing when you don;t say what you mean.

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

So many things happen during a frame.

Silly.