If we go back to the 4-3

JustSayNotoTO;1350313 said:
Where are you getting this? I never said I would pay him a ton, the idea of the thread is trading James for Thomas. Getting rid of James would be a godsend.
We would have to pay significantly for that trade -- both in terms of a re-worked contract (or extention -- I have no knowledge of his current contract situation) for Thomas and cap hit for James.
 
theogt;1350324 said:
We would have to pay significantly for that trade -- both in terms of a re-worked contract (or extention -- I have no knowledge of his current contract situation) for Thomas and cap hit for James.

I dont agree with that, the guy had an off year. I do agree with that one is a fluke and two is the honest truth.
 
Julius Jones;1350362 said:
I dont agree with that, the guy had an off year. I do agree with that one is a fluke and two is the honest truth.
What? What don't you agree with? Who had an off year? What are you talking about? Fluke?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,299
Messages
13,864,252
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top