If we go back to the 4-3

JustSayNotoTO;1350313 said:
Where are you getting this? I never said I would pay him a ton, the idea of the thread is trading James for Thomas. Getting rid of James would be a godsend.
We would have to pay significantly for that trade -- both in terms of a re-worked contract (or extention -- I have no knowledge of his current contract situation) for Thomas and cap hit for James.
 
theogt;1350324 said:
We would have to pay significantly for that trade -- both in terms of a re-worked contract (or extention -- I have no knowledge of his current contract situation) for Thomas and cap hit for James.

I dont agree with that, the guy had an off year. I do agree with that one is a fluke and two is the honest truth.
 
Julius Jones;1350362 said:
I dont agree with that, the guy had an off year. I do agree with that one is a fluke and two is the honest truth.
What? What don't you agree with? Who had an off year? What are you talking about? Fluke?
 
Back
Top