Ok. I'll cheerlead for arguments I don't understand. It must have just been the impression that your unsupportable argument was systematically dismantled and disposed of. I probably just didn't understand what really happened, though.
I know it's hard. You boyfriend Garrett fired Ron Ryan because he said we needed more chances for our offense via turnovers. We got more than ten extra chances with three games to go. We still ended up 8-8. That was your boyfriend, who you obviously have a mad crush on, said. So even if we were to accept the argument, that my argument was thrashed by whom you said it was, how does it absolve your boyfriend? Oh yeah, it doesn't.
Now as for my argument being thoroughly demolished, can you explain how so? Was it because, according to you, we can accurately gage whether TOs impacted scoring based upon field position? You know, because that's what you said before the aforementioned person even came into the discussion. Got to love how you reflect your claims to arguments being thoroughly demolished with arguments like this.
So yeah, still waiting to hear I was destroyed. Is the food almost ready yet?