Without a vet, you're going into the season with:
1) Pollard- coming off injury, and arguably not capable of being an every down back anyway.
2) Davis- an undrafted, unproven player with only 1 year of very limited experience.
3) Some rookie with zero experience, and zero proven production
I don't think you need to spend $10M to bring in an established RB. If you don't bring in a vet, you better be prepared to use a high pick on that rookie RB. You'll need one that can handle all aspects of the position, at a high level, immediately. No guarantee some random late round pick can do that.
YES
first off Pollards got the 10mil, hes the guy every down, no need spell, got Malik PLUS the drafted rbs easiest position to transition right away, that is as much or more then KC went into the season last year with..
Pollards injury is ZERO 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 issues..it max a 3month recvoery ..fracutre healed 100 already guaranteed. Its the high ankle sprain that take little longer but no points no second surgery this isnt a n ACL or ligament issue. not one bit of worry,.hes TC ready 100%
again, yes on all counts., pollard every bit as good as sander, Barkley, or whomever Washington rbs was already showed if. Again, that means we are set as much or more then KC or Philly was with their sb rb rosters..yup facts
If an injury occurs you bring in a vet street guy at that moment for the minimum, rb are that easy to replace REMEMBER the rhetoric about not paying zeke or any rb 2nd deal.yuppers we are set unless an injury occurs. get that OL fixed that what the $$$$ should be used for a physical LG steel back etc run game will move forward easily.