Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,482
- Reaction score
- 67,294
It isn't just about Romo. He isn't Manning or Brady in the manner in which he can audible effectively. He isn't as accurate and doesn't read coverages nearly as well. It is just as much the other players on offense as you alluded.TwentyOne;3088751 said:We sure can't appoach our offense like New England or Indi does. Why ? Just because we have no Manning or Brady at QB. We have Romo and we have to appoach our offense the way it suites Romo's skills best (and of course the skills of our other offensive players too).
We don't have the WRs, OL nor the efficient systems that the Colts and Patriots have now and have had in place for years. Our WRs do not get open as consistently. Our OL does not handle the blitz nearly as effectively.
It is a "passing league". That is why you need a good QB to win. We have that. We don't have an elite QB, at least not in the Manning/Brady mold, where you can load up the offense on his shoulders. I don't think Garrett's system is executed well enough nor does he have it running as flawlessly as what you see out of the Patriots or Colts.
But when the majority of the best teams finish in the top ten rushing, that doesn't lend much to the "the running game is obsolete" theory.