JustChip
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,669
- Reaction score
- 6,171
I can’t imagine what the players union would give up to protect less than 1% when the policy doesn’t effect 99% of the players.
And it’s not a matter of enjoying it it’s about recognizing it for what it is. Still today fans are caught up in this innocent or guilty verdict which was never the intent of the policy.
You may be right on the NFLPA and the 1%. However, the broader issue I think the NFLPA will argue is the virtually unilateral power for discipline wielded by the NFL office, in particular Roger Goodell.
Yes, business's management normally carries the weight and power for employee discipline, but abuses of management power was the genesis for labor organizations, which normally limits managements power in that area. I don't mean to compare what the NFL is doing to say the coal miners (or countless other industries) of first half of the 20th century except to make a point that management abuse runs counter to a cooperative management-employee working relationship, all it takes then is a strong union leadership for things to change (e.g., Marvin Miller).
Past NFLPA management has been too easy to agree to the NFL's "demands"; my read on current leadership is it is not the same. The NFLPA and the rank and file may not make a huge issue of DV punishment, per se, because of the 1%, but will fight strong to change the punishment authority dynamic. I think the punishment appeal process to change so that Goodell will no longer be the single authority for an appeal decision. As I minimum, I expect the next CBA will include an appeal process to a joint NFL-NFLPA "commission", if not the initial review and punishment decision.