Mac_MaloneV1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,437
- Reaction score
- 5,739
Because they wouldn't even be playing right now.And why didn't we get one again?
Also, they got a serviceable one as a UDFA>
Because they wouldn't even be playing right now.And why didn't we get one again?
I believe you draft position groups that are expensive early in the draft. Use free agency on positions that are down in the market. NE won 6 SB's with having a platoon of RB's and no super stars.O-line I think is #1 concern. Then RB.
Well and before any of that, QB. But we all know that's not happening...
I believe he has given up 1 sack all year.People act like he's the greatest guard in the league. Guys like him come out every year.
So? He's been fine, but that's a poor measure of how he's playing. He's fine. He wouldn't start on this team, and wouldn't be a difference maker.I believe he has given up 1 sack all year.
I'm just focused on Washington right now..........(thx Belichick for my response)My thoughts are it is week 18 and the Cowboys are going to the playoffs. The off season isn't even on my mind.
1. QBBased on our struggles, where do we look to improve this team?? Honestly the first obvious place to look is at your offensive scheme/OL coach. I gave you mine, what's yours? Please give your thoughts..
And who did we draft that is on topSo? He's been fine, but that's a poor measure of how he's playing. He's fine. He wouldn't start on this team, and wouldn't be a difference maker.
He's not near the top of ESPNS PBWR or RBWR and doesn't have a good PFF grade either.
That's not the point.And who did we draft that on top
of any board?
you finally stated your obvious issue!!A purge of crazy fans.
Not sure you understand the draft process. It is designed to build and strengthen your roster. Including adding depth.That's not the point.
Lol ok palNot sure you understand the draft process. It is designed to build and strengthen your roster. Including adding depth.
What OLineman on our bench would be better than O'Cyrus and has the potential to be a long term starter early in their career?Lol ok pal
Again, still not the point.What OLineman on our bench would be better than O'Cyrus and has the potential to be a long term starter early in their career?
Agree.Admit personal bias, but i still think they are better than most. Tyler is a stud. Steele has sucked this year but I believe he'll rebound. We do need some blue chip prospects though and oline is our # need.
Torrence would start at the other OG position, hands down.Again, still not the point.
Torrence wouldn't start in Dallas until Zack retires.
Starting w/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^A purge of crazy fans.
And when is Schoonmaker supposed to start?Again, still not the point.
Torrence wouldn't start in Dallas until Zack retires.
We had talent and depth at TE and still picked a TE in the 2nd round. I hated the pick the second we made it. I knew Ferguson was a stud AND we needed OL.That's the kind of missed pick that has haunted us all season. We had a chance to get a big dominant running mate for Tyler, and took a project in the 5th instead. Made no sense at the time and continues to puzzle.
At a bare minimum, Fergie was going to be serviceable, and he'd already shown that.We had talent and depth at TE and still picked a TE in the 2nd round. I hated the pick the second we made it. I knew Ferguson was a stud AND we needed OL.
Same thing as last year, and the year before, and the year before that... O freaking LBased on our struggles, where do we look to improve this team?? Honestly the first obvious place to look is at your offensive scheme/OL coach. I gave you mine, what's yours? Please give your thoughts..