jimmy40
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,866
- Reaction score
- 1,888
Sounds kind of familiar doesn't it?joseephuss;1445773 said:Sounds like Andre Johnson may be looking out for his QB by diverting some of the blame toward the coaches.
Sounds kind of familiar doesn't it?joseephuss;1445773 said:Sounds like Andre Johnson may be looking out for his QB by diverting some of the blame toward the coaches.
WoodysGirl;1445594 said:Palmer's influence over Romo was just for one year...and Romo was at a different place in his career when Palmer arrived.
joseephuss;1445754 said:Houston did not cut Glenn for performance reasons. It was strictly financial. They would have had to pay him a lot of money to keep him based on the contract he had with the Texans. Once released, he signed for a lot less in Dallas.
I'm still surprised Kubiak let him go because of this very reason. After everything the Texans have invested in Carr, why not try to develop him instead of cut him?WoodysGirl;1445547 said:"I think (the problem) was the way he was coached my first couple of years here," Johnson said. "He was pretty much just told where to throw the ball. And a lot of people didn't know that. He was never really taught to go through reads and stuff like that.
burmafrd;1446894 said:Part of making reads is practice; part is learning; and part of that is pure instinct. The Great Ones like Montana had that last one- that is what separated them from the good ones. Carr probably does not have that instinct- but anyone claiming that he could never have been good are just plain dumb. He had all the tools; the work ethic; the toughness. he was just put in a terrible place for any QB to be in. Like Archie Manning all those years in NO. By the time he finally escaped to Minnesota, he was a shell of what he was- but he still made it to the Pro Bowl while he was there.
He's not wrong. I've heard the same thing for years...and not just from media sources. FWIW.burmafrd;1446912 said:You are totally wrong about his work ethic- this is revisionist BS. there were numerous stories about how hard he was working as a rookie and through his second year. The Texans are spreading this stuff now because they are desperately trying to shift blame.
burmafrd;1446912 said:You are totally wrong about his work ethic- this is revisionist BS. there were numerous stories about how hard he was working as a rookie and through his second year. The Texans are spreading this stuff now because they are desperately trying to shift blame.
WoodysGirl;1446921 said:He's not wrong. I've heard the same thing for years...and not just from media sources. FWIW.
You know how it is. You know somebody who knows somebody who knows somebody. But if I'm hearing in one ear from one source...and then someone totally unrelated speaks on it, and it's consistent...like you said, for the past three years. Then there's gotta be something to it.jay cee;1446927 said:I have heard that about him for the past 3 years at least WG, but only from sportsradio.
burmafrd;1446932 said:How do you know they are telling the truth NOW? If you think they lied back then, why would you think they are NOT lieing now?
burmafrd;1446935 said:What I pointed out was that during his first 2 years, there were stories complementing him for working hard, etc. Now MAYBE he slipped as the hits piled up and the fact that the team was doing NOTHING to improve the O line got to him. BUT I do know that it was a different story back in 2002, 2003.
BARRYRAY;1445712 said:Houston blows anyway you cut it, as bad as we have been in places they're worse, anybody remember our nickel back for the last couple years, they said he was thru in Houston, another brainless decision..